Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32490811›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Functional specification of CCK+ interneurons by alternative isoforms of Kv4.3 auxiliary subunits.

Viktor János Oláh, David Lukacsovich, Jochen Winterer, Antónia Arszovszki, Andrea Lőrincz, Zoltan Nusser, Csaba Földy, János Szabadics

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Patch-seq: Advances and Biological Applications.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  3. The Basolateral Amygdala Sends a Mixed (GABAergic and Glutamatergic) Projection to the Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Biophysical KeLife · 2022
    Article
  7. Patch-seq: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Viktor János OláhLaboratory of Cellular Neuropharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
David LukacsovichLaboratory of Neural Connectivity, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jochen WintererLaboratory of Neural Connectivity, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Antónia ArszovszkiLaboratory of Cellular Neuropharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea LőrinczLaboratory of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltan NusserLaboratory of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-4111
Csaba FöldyLaboratory of Neural Connectivity, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
János SzabadicsLaboratory of Cellular Neuropharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4968-2562
University of Zurich · CHHUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

European Research Council Advance Grant ERC-AdG 787157European Research Council Consolidator Grant ERC-CoG 772452Hungarian National Brain Research Program KTIA_13_NAP-A-I/15Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_170085Swiss National Science Foundation CRETP3_166815Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 087497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CCK-expressing interneurons (CCK+INs) are crucial for controlling hippocampal activity. We found two firing phenotypes of CCK+INs in rat hippocampal CA3 area; either possessing a previously undetected membrane potential-dependent firing or regular firing phenotype, due to different low-voltage-activated potassium currents. These different excitability properties destine the two types for distinct functions, because the former is essentially silenced during realistic 8-15 Hz oscillations. By contrast, the general intrinsic excitability, morphology and gene-profiles of the two types were surprisingly similar. Even the expression of Kv4.3 channels were comparable, despite evidences showing that Kv4.3-mediated currents underlie the distinct firing properties. Instead, the firing phenotypes were correlated with the presence of distinct isoforms of Kv4 auxiliary subunits (KChIP1 vs. KChIP4e and DPP6S). Our results reveal the underlying mechanisms of two previously unknown types of CCK+INs and demonstrate that alternative splicing of few genes, which may be viewed as a minor change in the cells' whole transcriptome, can determine cell-type identity.

Indexed as

InterneuronsShal Potassium ChannelsAnimalsCA3 Region, HippocampalCells, CulturedCholecystokininMembrane PotentialsPhenotypeProtein SubunitsRatsRats, WistarTranscriptomeCholecystokininProtein SubunitsShal Potassium ChannelsGABAergic neuronshippocampusionic channelsmembrane excitabilityneuroscienceoscillationsratsplicing isoforms

Identifiers

PMID32490811
PMCPMC7269670
OpenAlexW3029218674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.