Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32490342›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

Impact of adherence to board-certified surgeon systems and clinical practice guidelines on colon cancer surgical outcomes in Japan: A questionnaire survey of the National Clinical Database.

Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Hiroaki Miyata, Mitsukazu Gotoh, Kenjiro Kotake, Kenichi Sugihara, Yasushi Toh, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Yasuyuki Seto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer clinical practice guidelines and associated survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hirotoshi KobayashiThe Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-0439
Hiroyuki YamamotoNational Clinical Database Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-7595
Hiroaki MiyataNational Clinical Database Tokyo Japan.
Mitsukazu GotohThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.
Kenjiro KotakeThe Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Kenichi SugiharaThe Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Yasushi TohThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0241
Yasuyuki SetoThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8752
Keio University · JPThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPTeikyo University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the effectiveness of the institutional medical structure and of the implemented clinical practice guidelines for improving colon cancer surgical outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a web-based questionnaire survey among departments registered at the National Clinical Database in Japan from October 2014 to January 2015 to assess the association between quality indicators (QIs), including structure and process indicators (clinical practice guideline adherence), and the risk-adjusted odds ratio for operative mortality (AOR) after right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer during the study period.

resultsAmong the 2064 departments registering at least one colorectal surgery during the study period, we obtained responses from 814 departments (39.4%). Our analysis on data from 22 816 patients with right hemicolectomy demonstrated that three structural QIs (certification of training hospitals by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and the presences of board-certified gastroenterological and colorectal surgeons) were associated with significantly lower AOR (

conclusionThe board certification system for gastroenterological and colorectal surgeons and the adherence to the clinical guidelines improve the operative mortality after right hemicolectomy. It is desired to clarify the most suitable QIs to reduce the operative mortality after colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

board‐certified surgeoncolon cancerquality indicatorquestionnaire surveyright hemicolectomy

Identifiers

PMID32490342
PMCPMC7240142
OpenAlexW3015472756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.