Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32490239›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2020

Corticotomy in orthodontic treatment: systematic review.

Alina Apalimova, Àlvar Roselló, Enric Jané-Salas, Carlos Arranz-Obispo, Antonio Marí-Roig, José López-López

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of piezoelectric-assisted orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alina ApalimovaDepartment of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Àlvar RosellóDepartment of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Enric Jané-SalasMedicine and Surgery, Oral Medicine at the School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Arranz-ObispoMedicine and Surgery, Oral Medicine at the School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Marí-RoigMedicine and Surgery, Oral Medicine at the School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
José López-LópezMedicine and Surgery, Oral Medicine at the School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate corticotomies effects to accelerate or facilitate dental movements in different kind of orthodontic treatments. DATA: This report followed the PRISMA Statement. A total of 9 articles were included in review. SOURCES: Two reviewers performed a literature search up to December 2018 in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and SciELO. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled clinical trials and randomized controlled clinical trials conducted in human patients and published during the last 10 years in English were eligible to be selected. The articles should give detailed information about the results and treatment parameters. There were no limitations established in terms of the type of malocclusion to be corrected or the type of orthodontic treatment performed.

resultsThe methodological quality and evidence of the selected studies was low. Most of the studies observed a statistically significant increase in the rate of dental movement, when performing alveolar corticotomies as coadjuvants of orthodontic treatment; either with the conventional technique or with piezocision. The effect of combining corticotomy with bone grafts was assessed.

conclusionsHigh heterogeneity among studies made it difficult to draw clear conclusions. However, within the limitations of this review, the corticotomy procedures were able to statistically and clinically produce significant temporary decrease in orthodontic tooth movement rate. This technique does not seem to involve major complications compared to conventional orthodontic treatments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of this technique can reduce treatment time and therefore the undesirable effects associated with prolonged treatments.

Indexed as

CAOTCorticotomyDental materialsDental surgeryDentistryOral medicineOrthodontic surgeryPeriodonticsProsthetic dentistry

Identifiers

PMID32490239
PMCPMC7260439
OpenAlexW3031786732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.