ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2020
A study to compare maternal and perinatal outcome in early vs. late onset preeclampsia.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Pooled it
- Proteomic Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition Signature in Fetoplacental Small Extracellular Vesicles of Early-Onset Preeclampsia.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and maternal-fetal outcomes of early-onset versus late-onset of preeclampsia: a prospective cohort study at Wallaga university compressive specialized hospital.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Role of aspirin therapy in modulating uterine artery resistance and placental growth between first and second trimesters of pregnancy.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Observational
- Exosomal-complement system activation in preeclampsia.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Review
- Current Approaches and Innovations in Managing Preeclampsia: Highlighting Maternal Health Disparities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Maternal serum apelin-13 levels in early- and late-onset preeclampsia.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Glycemic control assessed by continuous glucose monitoring during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes and its association with preeclampsia, an observational Swedish cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Observational
- Establishment of a placental lncRNA-mRNA expression network for early-onset preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Vitamin D Deficiency as a Risk Factor of Preeclampsia during Pregnancy.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cell-free DNA methylome analysis for early preeclampsia prediction.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index with early- and late-onset severe preeclampsia.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023Article
- The complement system in preeclampsia: a review of its activation and endothelial injury in the triad of COVID-19 infection and HIV-associated preeclampsia.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- Correlation of sFlt/PlGF ratio with severity of preeclampsia in an Indian population.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Preeclampsia and aspirin.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- Differential Expression ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- What Is the Correlation between Preeclampsia and Cancer? The Important Role of Tachykinins and Transition Metal Ions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pre-eclampsia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe risk factors, clinical trends, and maternal and fetal health of early- and late-onset preeclampsia have not been adequately studied. We examined the effects of early- and late-onset preeclampsia on maternal and perinatal outcomes as well as the known risk factors of preeclampsia.
methodsOne hundred and fifty women with preeclampsia were consecutively enrolled in each group. Those who developed preeclampsia before 34 weeks of gestation were identified as having early-onset preeclampsia, while those who developed at 34 weeks or later were identified as having late-onset preeclampsia. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between groups.
resultsCompared with the late-onset group, the early-onset group had higher rates of abruptio placentae (16% vs. 7.3%;
conclusionThese study findings indicate that women with early-onset preeclampsia had more adverse outcome than those with late-onset preeclampsia, but the difference was not statistically significant. There were more babies with adverse perinatal outcomes in the early-than late-onset group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.