Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489811›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Andrew's bridge system: A boon for huge ridge defect in aesthetic zone.

Romesh Soni, Himanshi Yadav, Vikram Kumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romesh SoniDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.
Himanshi YadavDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.
Vikram KumarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INBanaras Hindu University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tooth loss may pose a challenge for prosthetics when several missing teeth are associated with huge vertical and horizontal bone defects due to cleft palate, road traffic accidents, congenital defects etc. This case report presents prosthetic rehabilitation of a 22 year old male patient of cleft lip and palate with missing upper front teeth along with severe ridge defect since 1 year due to surgical intervention in premaxillary region. The extensive soft and hard tissue defect in aesthetic region was evident and it made the prosthetic rehabilitation more challenging. Among treatment options, fixed partial denture (FPD) was not feasible due to long edentulous span and extensive soft and hard tissue loss. Psychologically, patient was not ready for removable prosthesis. Patient was also not ready for next implant or bone augmentation surgery procedure. The patient presented with Kennedy class IV edentulous area with Seibert's class III ridge defect, so fixed-removable prosthesis was planned to compensate soft and hard tissue defect. The patient with several missing teeth and extensive visible bony defect in the anterior region was successfully rehabilitated using fixed-removable Andrew's bridge system. Although it is not commonly used by dentist so this present case report shows effective management of huge defect case by very simple and conservative technique.

Indexed as

Andrew's bridge systemCleft lip and palateFixed-removable prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID32489811
PMCPMC7254458
OpenAlexW3016160090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.