ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Andrew's bridge system: A boon for huge ridge defect in aesthetic zone.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Andrews Bridge: The fixed but removable solution- A case report.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Oral Rehabilitation With Modified Andrew's Bridge for Alveolar Bone Defect: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tooth loss may pose a challenge for prosthetics when several missing teeth are associated with huge vertical and horizontal bone defects due to cleft palate, road traffic accidents, congenital defects etc. This case report presents prosthetic rehabilitation of a 22 year old male patient of cleft lip and palate with missing upper front teeth along with severe ridge defect since 1 year due to surgical intervention in premaxillary region. The extensive soft and hard tissue defect in aesthetic region was evident and it made the prosthetic rehabilitation more challenging. Among treatment options, fixed partial denture (FPD) was not feasible due to long edentulous span and extensive soft and hard tissue loss. Psychologically, patient was not ready for removable prosthesis. Patient was also not ready for next implant or bone augmentation surgery procedure. The patient presented with Kennedy class IV edentulous area with Seibert's class III ridge defect, so fixed-removable prosthesis was planned to compensate soft and hard tissue defect. The patient with several missing teeth and extensive visible bony defect in the anterior region was successfully rehabilitated using fixed-removable Andrew's bridge system. Although it is not commonly used by dentist so this present case report shows effective management of huge defect case by very simple and conservative technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.