Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489752›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2019

A Systematic Review of Technology-Driven Methodologies for Estimation of Energy Intake.

Abul Doulah, Megan A McCrory, Janine A Higgins, Edward Sazonov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Image-Based Volume Estimation for Food in a Bowl.Journal of food engineering · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Criterion validity of wrist accelerometry for assessing energy intake via the intake-balance technique.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abul DoulahDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8161-6602
Megan A McCroryDepartment of Health Sciences, Boston University, MA 02215, USA.
Janine A HigginsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80045, USA.
Edward SazonovDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-4234

Funding

Assessing Food Intake with the Automatic Ingestion MonitorR01DK100796 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI MCCRORY, MEGAN A, SAZONOV, EDWARD S · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate measurement of energy intake (EI) is important for estimation of energy balance, and, correspondingly, body weight dynamics. Traditional measurements of EI rely on self-report, which may be inaccurate and underestimate EI. The imperfections in traditional methodologies such as 24-hour dietary recall, dietary record, and food frequency questionnaire stipulate development of technology-driven methods that rely on wearable sensors and imaging devices to achieve an objective and accurate assessment of EI. The aim of this research was to systematically review and examine peer-reviewed papers that cover the estimation of EI in humans, with the focus on emerging technology-driven methodologies. Five major electronic databases were searched for articles published from January 2005 to August 2017: Pubmed, Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, ACM library, and Google Scholar. Twenty-six eligible studies were retrieved that met the inclusion criteria. The review identified that while the current methods of estimating EI show promise, accurate estimation of EI in free-living individuals presents many challenges and opportunities. The most accurate result identified for EI (kcal) estimation had an average accuracy of 94%. However, collectively, the results were obtained from a limited number of food items (i.e., 19), small sample sizes (i.e., 45 meal images), and primarily controlled conditions. Therefore, new methods that accurately estimate EI over long time periods in free-living conditions are needed.

Indexed as

clinical study methodologydietary assessmentenergy balanceEnergy intakeobesitywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID32489752
PMCPMC7266287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.