Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489709›Full record

ReviewAging and disease2020

Management of The Elderly Cancer Patients Complexity: The Radiation Oncology Potential.

Giuseppe Colloca, Luca Tagliaferri, Beatrice Di Capua, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Vito Lanzotti, Andrea Bellieni, Silvio Monfardini, Lodovico Balducci, Roberto Bernabei, William C Cho and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Perspectives and limits of cancer treatment in an oldest old population.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Surgery Versus Radiotherapy in Older Adults with Oral Cavity Cancer: A Nationwide Comparative Effectiveness Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe Colloca1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
Luca Tagliaferri1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
Beatrice Di Capua1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
Maria Antonietta Gambacorta1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
Vito Lanzotti1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
Andrea Bellieni2Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Silvio Monfardini4Geriatric Oncology Program Istituto Palazzolo, Milano, Italy.
Lodovico Balducci5Senior Adult Oncology Program Moffitt Cancer CenterTampa, USA.
Roberto Bernabei2Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
William C Cho6Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
Vincenzo Valentini1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USQueen Elizabeth Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation oncology has the potential to be an excellent option for the frail elderly cancer patients because of its limited systemic toxicities. It can be effective for curative, prophylactic, disease control or palliative purposes. Currently about 60% of all cancer patients undergoing active treatment at some point receive radiation treatment. However, though widely used, there are limited clinical trials strictly designed for the elderly. This paper will review the key points in the assessment and treatment of elderly cancer patient including quality of life, active life expectancy, cognitive performance, frailty, sarcopenia and how the new technologies can help to reach the key goal of maintaining autonomy and independence for the elderly cancer patient.

Indexed as

cancercomplexityelderlyfrailtypersonalized treatmentquality of liferadiation oncologysarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID32489709
PMCPMC7220284
OpenAlexW3024675213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.