Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489675›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Physical Activity Intervention for Loneliness (PAIL) in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised feasibility study.

Anastasia V Shvedko, Janice L Thompson, Carolyn A Greig, Anna C Whittaker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458793 (Physical Activity Intervention for Loneliness), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458793 nacompletednot on this map

Physical Activity Intervention for Loneliness (PAIL) in Community-dwelling Older Adults: a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BirminghamRan2018 to 2018Enrolled25ConditionsLoneliness, Ageing, Physical ActivityArmsGroup walking and group educational workshops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Walking for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anastasia V ShvedkoSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Janice L ThompsonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Carolyn A GreigSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anna C WhittakerSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow quality social relationships in older adults are strongly associated with feelings of loneliness. Physical activity interventions could reduce loneliness and improve psychological well-being, among other health benefits. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of a Physical Activity Intervention for Loneliness (PAIL) in community-dwelling older adults at risk of loneliness.

methodsThe PAIL feasibility study was a 12-week randomized controlled feasibility trial (RCT) conducted in Birmingham, United Kingdom, from February 2018 to August 2018, and ran in two waves of data collection. Eligible participants were community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older, sedentary (less than 20 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) a week), and at risk of loneliness. The intervention included once-weekly group walk and health education workshop up to 90 min per session in total, with a wait-listed (WL) control group. The primary feasibility outcomes were to estimate recruitment, retention rates and adherence to the intervention. Secondary outcome measures (not blinded assessment) were body mass index, blood pressure, physical activity and psychosocial variables. Process and outcome evaluations were conducted using focus groups interviews. The recruitment and retention progression criteria for the definitive large-scale RCT was set a-priori.

resultsForty-eight participants were recruited over 4 months with a recruitment rate of 25% (48/195); 52% (25/48) met the inclusion criteria and 100% (25/25) were randomised into the intervention (

conclusionsThe findings suggest that community-dwelling older adults at risk of loneliness found the intervention and measures acceptable and could safely participate. However, a more extensive and robust strategy would be needed to support adequate recruitment of lonely older adults and adherence into a definitive RCT.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT03458793.

Indexed as

Feasibility studyLonelinessOlder adultsPhysical activityRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32489675
PMCPMC7245022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.