ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ivor Lewis minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus McKeown approach: short-term benefits and mid-term equivalence in a randomized trial for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Early Outcomes of Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Experience From an Oncology Center in Nepal.Cureus · 2026Article
- Perioperative risk factors for prognosis in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy: A retrospective study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Developing sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy is associated with worse survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.Surgery · 2024Article
- Complication Prediction after Esophagectomy with Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pattern of Aorto-coeliac Calcification Correlating Cervical Esophago-gastric Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy for Cancer: a Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Article
- Postesophagectomy chylothorax: a review of the risk factors, diagnosis, and management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- RecruitmentBMJ open · 2022Article
- Prevalence, nature and trajectory of dysphagia postoesophageal cancer surgery: a prospective longitudinal study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers associated with the high mortality rate. Timely diagnosis and treatment are important to manage the disease and prevent comorbidities. Surgical resection of the tumor and lymph nodes is usually practiced either with or without chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Despite advancements in surgical methods and skills, complex nature of the esophagus and invasiveness of the surgery can lead to serious complications in these patients. In order to predict postoperative outcomes, preoperative examination of the patients, in addition to risk factors, should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.