Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489613›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2020

Effects of ocean acidification on Antarctic marine organisms: A meta-analysis.

Alyce M Hancock, Catherine K King, Jonathan S Stark, Andrew McMinn, Andrew T Davidson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Adaptation Strategy of the Planula Strobilation in Moon Jelly,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Meta-analysis suggests negative, butEcology and evolution · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alyce M HancockInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Battery Point TAS Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-5592
Catherine K KingAustralian Antarctic Division Kingston TAS Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-0381
Jonathan S StarkAustralian Antarctic Division Kingston TAS Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4268-8072
Andrew McMinnInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Battery Point TAS Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-3854
Andrew T DavidsonAntarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre Battery Point TAS Australia.
Australian Antarctic Division · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Southern Ocean waters are among the most vulnerable to ocean acidification. The projected increase in the CO

Indexed as

bacteriaclimate changeCO2fishinvertebratesmacroalgaepHphytoplanktonSouthern Ocean

Identifiers

PMID32489613
PMCPMC7246202
OpenAlexW3017300063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.