Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489439›Full record

ReviewAnnals of thoracic medicine

An overview of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Can tests of small airways' function guide diagnosis and management?

Nowaf Y Alobaidi, James A Stockley, Robert A Stockley, Elizabeth Sapey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06713213 (Clinical Comparison of FRNDS Cannula and Plethysmography Belts), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06713213 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Comparison of FRNDS Cannula and Plethysmography Belts

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled57ConditionsRespiratory Failure With HypoxiaArmsFlow-regulated nasal oxygen delivery system (FRNDS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nowaf Y AlobaidiCentre for Translational Inflammation Research, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James A StockleyDepartment of Lung Function and Sleep, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Robert A StockleyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth SapeyCentre for Translational Inflammation Research, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common and debilitating. Most patients with COPD experience intermittent, acute deterioration in symptoms which require additional therapy, termed exacerbations. Exacerbations are prevalent in COPD and are associated with poor clinical outcomes including death, a faster decline in lung health, and a reduced quality of life. Current guidelines highlight the need to treat exacerbations promptly and then mitigate future risk. However, exacerbations are self-reported, difficult to diagnose and are treated with pharmacological therapies which have largely been unchanged over 30 years. Recent research has highlighted how exacerbations vary in their underlying cause, with specific bacteria, viruses, and cell types implicated. This variation offers the opportunity for new targeted therapies, but to develop these new therapies requires sensitive tools to reliably identify the cause, the start, and end of an exacerbation and assess the response to treatment. Currently, COPD is diagnosed and monitored using spirometric measures, principally the forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity, but these tests alone cannot reliably diagnose an exacerbation. Measures of small airways' function appear to be an early marker of COPD, and some studies have suggested that these tests might also provide physiological biomarkers for exacerbations. In this review, we will discuss how exacerbations of COPD are currently defined, stratified, monitored, and treated and review the current literature to determine if tests of small airways' function might improve diagnostic accuracy or the assessment of response to treatment.

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasediagnosisexacerbationmonitoringsmall airway dysfunctionsmall airway tests

Identifiers

PMID32489439
PMCPMC7259399
OpenAlexW3014591040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.