ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2020
Impact of changing GOLD guidelines (2007-2011-2017) on assignment of a COPD patient to disease severity category.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and osteoporosis: A prospective cross-sectional study.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Sense of loneliness and meaning in life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Preliminary studies.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of Immediate and Sequential Withdrawal of a Systemic Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Controlled, Open-Label Study.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe international standard for the recognition and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is guided by a regularly updated set of criteria developed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).
aimTo investigate the impact of updated COPD management guidelines from 2007 to 2017 (GOLD 2007, GOLD 2011 and GOLD 2017) on the assignment of patients into individual therapeutic groups, examining both individual and population dimensions. MATERIAL AND
methodsEach of 500 randomly chosen primary care physicians in Poland provided information on 10 individual COPD patients (disease history, clinical status, treatment and pharmacotherapy). This data was used to simulate the consequences of the implementation of the GOLD 2007, 2011 and 2017 guidelines.
resultsA group of 298 physicians of 500 approached provided information on 2597 patients (64.2% males) aged 29-96 (61.6 ±11.1 years). Based on GOLD 2007 guidelines, most patients (56.7%) presented a severe stage of COPD. GOLD 2011 updates would significantly increase the proportion of patients with the most severe stage of disease, and this group would be predominantly classified as moderate or severe in GOLD 2007. The implementation of GOLD 2017 guidelines would result in a significant migration of patients towards the lightest (category A) form of the disease.
conclusionsUpdates to the GOLD 2007 COPD guidelines for GOLD 2011 and 2017 would have a significant impact on the classification of patients for particular therapeutic groups. As a result of the migration of patients to particular therapeutic groups, the pharmacological treatment would also change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.