Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489335›Full record

ReviewClinical proteomics2020

Recent advances in mass spectrometry based clinical proteomics: applications to cancer research.

Andrew Macklin, Shahbaz Khan, Thomas Kislinger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical proteomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 306 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predictive Biomarkers of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Efficacy for Solid Tumors: Current Challenges and the Potential Role of Quantitative Proteomics.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew Macklin *Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Shahbaz Khan *Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Thomas KislingerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3525-5540
University Health Network · CA

Funding

Development of Protein Biomarkers in Post-DRE Urine for use in Liquid Biopsy of Prostate CancerU01CA214194 · NCI · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BOUTROS, PAUL CHRISTOPHER, KISLINGER, THOMAS · 2016 to 2021
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer biomarkers have transformed current practices in the oncology clinic. Continued discovery and validation are crucial for improving early diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring patient response to treatment. Profiling of the tumour genome and transcriptome are now established tools for the discovery of novel biomarkers, but alterations in proteome expression are more likely to reflect changes in tumour pathophysiology. In the past, clinical diagnostics have strongly relied on antibody-based detection strategies, but these methods carry certain limitations. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful method that enables increasingly comprehensive insights into changes of the proteome to advance personalized medicine. In this review, recent improvements in MS-based clinical proteomics are highlighted with a focus on oncology. We will provide a detailed overview of clinically relevant samples types, as well as, consideration for sample preparation methods, protein quantitation strategies, MS configurations, and data analysis pipelines currently available to researchers. Critical consideration of each step is necessary to address the pressing clinical questions that advance cancer patient diagnosis and prognosis. While the majority of studies focus on the discovery of clinically-relevant biomarkers, there is a growing demand for rigorous biomarker validation. These studies focus on high-throughput targeted MS assays and multi-centre studies with standardized protocols. Additionally, improvements in MS sensitivity are opening the door to new classes of tumour-specific proteoforms including post-translational modifications and variants originating from genomic aberrations. Overlaying proteomic data to complement genomic and transcriptomic datasets forges the growing field of proteogenomics, which shows great potential to improve our understanding of cancer biology. Overall, these advancements not only solidify MS-based clinical proteomics' integral position in cancer research, but also accelerate the shift towards becoming a regular component of routine analysis and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biomarker discoveryCancerClinical proteomicsMass spectrometryProteogenomicsTargeted assay

Identifiers

PMID32489335
PMCPMC7247207
OpenAlexW3030505384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.