Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489264›Full record

Trial reportCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2020

A randomized trial of the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale for quality-of-life assessment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

J C Kuo, D M Graham, A Salvarrey, F Kassam, L W Le, F A Shepherd, R Burkes, P J Hollen, R J Gralla, N B Leighl

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

J C KuoDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
D M GrahamDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
A SalvarreyDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
F KassamDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
L W LeDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
F A ShepherdDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
R BurkesDivision of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON.
P J HollenSchool of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, U.S.A.
R J GrallaAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, U.S.A.
N B LeighlDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Virginia · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Improving health-related quality of life (hrqol) is a key goal of systemic therapy in advanced lung cancer, although routine assessment remains challenging. We analyzed the impact of a real-time electronic hrqol tool, the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (elcss-ql), on palliative care (pc) referral rates, patterns of chemotherapy treatment, and use of other supportive interventions in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with advanced nsclc starting first-line chemotherapy were randomized to their oncologist receiving or not receiving their elcss-ql data before each clinic visit. Patients completed the elcss-ql at baseline, before each chemotherapy cycle, and at subsequent follow-up visits until disease progression. Prospective data about the pc referral rate, hrqol, and use of other supportive interventions were collected. Results: For the 95 patients with advanced nsclc who participated, oncologists received real-time elcss-ql data for 44 (elcss-ql arm) and standard clinical assessment alone for 51 (standard arm). The primary endpoint, the pc referral rate, was numerically higher, but statistically similar, for patients in the elcss-ql and standard arms. The hrqol scores over time were not significantly different between the two study arms. Conclusions: The elcss-ql is feasible as a tool for use in routine clinical practice, although no statistically significant effect of its use was demonstrated in our study. Improving access to supportive care through the collection of patient-reported outcomes and hrqol should be an important component of care for patients with advanced lung cancer.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungElectronicsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareQuality of Lifepalliative carePatient-reported outcomessupportive care

Identifiers

PMID32489264
PMCPMC7253732
OpenAlexW3029613184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.