Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489262›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2020

Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer.

A Arnaout, N P Varela, M Allarakhia, L Grimard, A Hey, J Lau, L Thain, A Eisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancer diagnosis in primary care: Six steps to reducing the diagnostic interval.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  13. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

A ArnaoutDepartment of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
N P VarelaProgram in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), and Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
M AllarakhiaPatient Representative, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON.
L GrimardDepartment of Radiation Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON.
A HeyRegional Primary Care, Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON.
J LauDepartment of Radiology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
L ThainOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Regional Imaging, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, and Mackenzie Health, Richmond Hill, ON.
A EisenDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CACancer Care Ontario · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAMcMaster University · CANortheast Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Ontario, there is no clearly defined standard of care for staging for distant metastasis in women with newly diagnosed and biopsy-confirmed breast cancer whose clinical presentation is suggestive of early-stage disease. This guideline addresses baseline imaging investigations for women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic for distant metastasis. Methods: The medline and embase databases were systematically searched for evidence from January 2000 to April 2019, and the best available evidence was used to draft recommendations relevant to the use of baseline imaging investigation in women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic. Final approval of this practice guideline was obtained from both the Staging in Early Stage Breast Cancer Advisory Committee and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-Based Care. Recommendations: These recommendations apply to all women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer (originating in the breast) who have no symptoms of distant metastasis Staging tests using conventional anatomic imaging [chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (ct)] or metabolic imaging modalities [integrated positron-emission tomography (pet)/ct, integrated pet/magnetic resonance imaging (mri), bone scintigraphy] should not be routinely ordered for women newly diagnosed with clinical stage i or stage ii breast cancer who have no symptoms of distant metastasis, regardless of biomarker status. In women newly diagnosed with stage iii breast cancer, baseline staging tests using either anatomic imaging (chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest-abdomen-pelvis ct) or metabolic imaging modalities (pet/ct, pet/mri, bone scintigraphy) should be considered regardless of whether the patient is symptomatic for distant metastasis and regardless of biomarker profile.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingBaseline stagingbreast cancer, early-stagedistant metastasesimaging

Identifiers

PMID32489262
PMCPMC7253735
OpenAlexW3031739588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.