Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489252›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2020

The most important attribute: stakeholder perspectives on what matters most in a physician.

P Wheatley-Price, K Laurie, T Zhang, D Bossé, D Chowdhury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Scoping Review on the Concept of Physician Caring.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P Wheatley-PriceDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
K LaurieDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
T ZhangThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.
D BosséDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
D ChowdhuryDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital Research Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most people can think of important attributes that they believe physicians should have. The canmeds framework defines domains of attributes in medical training (Leader, Medical Expert, Scholar, Communicator, Advocate, Collaborator, and Professional). Whether some are more valued by various stakeholders is unknown. Previous research has shown that patients can receive suboptimal care if physician and patient expectations of a health care encounter differ. In the present study, we sought to identify what various stakeholders identified as the single most important attribute for a physician to possess. Methods: A simple survey asked the question "What is the single most important attribute a physician should have?" at a single academic teaching hospital and affiliated medical school. The survey was administered to medical students, doctors, nurses, patients, and caregivers. Age and sex were also collected. Responses were assigned to domains and analyzed to identify trends. The primary outcome is a descriptive analysis of the findings. Results: From 362 individuals who responded, 109 different responses were obtained. The single most common answer was "compassion" ( Conclusions: All stakeholder group identified attributes in the Caring domain as being most important. Although all canmeds roles are important, our research highlights the priorities of stakeholders.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMalePhysiciansStakeholder Participationmedical educationphysician attributesquality of careStakeholders in health care system

Identifiers

PMID32489252
PMCPMC7253743
OpenAlexW3028910108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.