ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2020
A catalyst for transforming health systems and person-centred care: Canadian national position statement on patient-reported outcomes.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Pooled it
- Psychometric properties and constructs of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in primary care: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Pilot Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Stargardt Disease: Correlation With Functional and Structural Findings.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Use of an Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Develop an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Cancer Rehabilitation: Tutorial.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Identification and Description of Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Agencies' Guidance Related to Patient Experience Data in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Enhancing provider adoption of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) through implementation science: insights from two international workshops.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Research trends among new investigators at ISOQOL: a bibliometric analysis from 2019 to 2023.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Translation and linguistic validation of 24 PROMIS item banks into French.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Barriers and enablers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs): protocol for an umbrella review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Unfolding biographies-a participatory narrative study on how older adults with multiple sclerosis make sense of and manage their everyday lives.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- To share or not to share: communication of caregiver-reported outcomes when a patient has colorectal cancer.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Priority recommendations for the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical cancer care: a Delphi study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
- The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Article
- Family-Reported Outcomes Measures (FROMs) Screening Programs an Integral Part of Chronic Disease Management: A Scoping Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (pros) are essential to capture the patient's perspective and to influence care. Although pros and pro measures are known to have many important benefits, they are not consistently being used and there is there no Canadian pros oversight. The Position Statement presented here is the first step toward supporting the implementation of pros in the Canadian health care setting. Methods: The Canadian pros National Steering Committee drafted position statements, which were submitted for stakeholder feedback before, during, and after the first National Canadian Patient Reported Outcomes (canpros) scientific conference, 14-15 November 2019 in Calgary, Alberta. In addition to the stakeholder feedback cycle, a patient advocate group submitted a section to capture the patient voice. Results: The canpros Position Statement is an outcome of the 2019 canpros scientific conference, with an oncology focus. The Position Statement is categorized into 6 sections covering 4 theme areas: Patient and Families, Health Policy, Clinical Implementation, and Research. The patient voice perfectly mirrors the recommendations that the experts reached by consensus and provides an overriding impetus for the use of pros in health care. Conclusions: Although our vision of pros transforming the health care system to be more patient-centred is still aspirational, the Position Statement presented here takes a first step toward providing recommendations in key areas to align Canadian efforts. The Position Statement is directed toward a health policy audience; future iterations will target other audiences, including researchers, clinicians, and patients. Our intent is that future versions will broaden the focus to include chronic diseases beyond cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.