Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489221›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2019

Case-only trees and random forests for exploring genotype-specific treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with dichotomous endpoints.

James Y Dai, Michael LeBlanc

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James Y DaiPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
Michael LeBlancPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Catherine M. Tangen · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Use of Biomarkers in Diagnosis, Prognosis, Risk Prediction and Early Detection ofP01CA053996 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 1991 to 2015
$9.4M
PCPT and SELECT cohorts: Core Infrastructure Support for Cancer Research UM1CA182883 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TANGEN, CATHERINE M., THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2013 to 2017
$5.2M
Statistical Genetics and Genomics for Epidemiologic ResearchR01CA222833 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SUN, WEI · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Statistical inference in genome-wide association and sequencing studiesR01HL114901 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DAI, JAMES · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA053996NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182883NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering gene-treatment interactions in clinical trials is of rising interest in the era of precision medicine. Nonparametric statistical learning methods such as trees and random forests are useful tools for building prediction rules. In this article, we introduce trees and random forests to the recently proposed case-only approach for discovering gene-treatment interactions and estimating marker-specific treatment effects for a dichotomous trial endpoints. The motivational example is a case-control genetic association study in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), which tested the hypothesis whether finasteride can prevent prostate cancer. We compare this novel approach to the interaction tree method previously proposed. Because of the modeling simplicity - directly targeting at interaction - and the statistical efficiency of the case-only approach, case-only trees and random forests yield more accurate prediction of heterogeneous treatment effects and better measure of variable importance, relative to the interaction tree method which uses data from both cases and controls. Application of the proposed case-only trees and random forests to the PCPT study yielded a discovery of genotypes that may influence the prevention effect of finasteride.

Indexed as

case-only methodsgene-treatment interactionindividualized treatment effectsprecision medicinesubgroups

Identifiers

PMID32489221
PMCPMC7266264
OpenAlexW2956798093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.