Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489204›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2020

Development, validation and evaluation of a novel self-instructional module in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Babita Ghai, Kapil Gudala, Mir M Asrar, Neha Chanana, Raju Kanukula, Dipika Bansal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Babita GhaiDepartment of Anesthesia, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kapil GudalaClinical Research Unit, Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Mir M AsrarClinical Research Unit, Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Neha ChananaDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Raju KanukulaClinical Research Unit, Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Dipika BansalClinical Research Unit, Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INNational Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is ranked highest in terms of disability-adjusted life-years lived. Patient education and self-management have shown to play a crucial role in the overall pain management. However, the literature on the same with respect to Indian context is still lacking. The study was aimed to develop, validate and assess the acceptability and effectiveness of self-instructional educational module among Indian chronic LBP (CLBP) patients.

methodsA prospective single-arm open-label study was conducted in a pain clinic of a tertiary care public hospital in North India with 'Backcare booklet-self-instructional module (SIM)' as an intervention in patients with CLBP. SIM was developed with the intent to provide up-to-date evidence-based information in an easy understanding way to patients with CLBP. 132 patients were administered SIM with a single session of verbal explanation. Pain intensity (numeric rating scale [NRS]), disability, fear-avoidance belief Questionnaire (FABQ), quality of life (EQ5D) and knowledge level were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of intervention. Student's paired

results120 patients successfully completed the 3 months' follow-up. Significant reductions were observed in pain intensity (76[12] vs 55 [15,

conclusionBackcare booklet as an intervention, along with usual pharmacological care is a cost-effective educational medium to promote self-management of CLBP in the clinical outpatient settings.

Indexed as

EQ5Dfear-avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ)functional disabilityknowledge levelLow back painpain intensityself-instruction module

Identifiers

PMID32489204
PMCPMC7259409
OpenAlexW3013626967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.