Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489174›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2020

Using web search queries to monitor influenza-like illness: an exploratory retrospective analysis, Netherlands, 2017/18 influenza season.

Paul P Schneider, Christel Jaw van Gool, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Mariëtte Hooiveld, Gé A Donker, David J Barnett, John Paget

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Forecasting and Surveillance of COVID-19 Spread Using Google Trends: Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. High variability in model performance of Google relative search volumes in spatially clustered COVID-19 areas of the USA.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Trends of Online Search of COVID-19 Related Terms in Cyprus.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul P SchneiderSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Christel Jaw van GoolSchool CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Peter SpreeuwenbergNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mariëtte HooiveldNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gé A DonkerNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.
David J BarnettFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
John PagetNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108903/B/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the early development of Google Flu Trends in 2009, standards for digital epidemiology methods have not been established and research from European countries is scarce.AimIn this article, we study the use of web search queries to monitor influenza-like illness (ILI) rates in the Netherlands in real time.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, we simulated the weekly use of a prediction model for estimating the then-current ILI incidence across the 2017/18 influenza season solely based on Google search query data. We used weekly ILI data as reported to The European Surveillance System (TESSY)  each week, and we removed the then-last 4 weeks from our dataset. We then fitted a prediction model based on the then-most-recent search query data from Google Trends to fill the 4-week gap ('Nowcasting'). Lasso regression, in combination with cross-validation, was applied to select predictors and to fit the 52 models, one for each week of the season.ResultsThe models provided accurate predictions with a mean and maximum absolute error of 1.40 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.75) and 6.36 per 10,000 population. The onset, peak and end of the epidemic were predicted with an error of 1, 3 and 2 weeks, respectively. The number of search terms retained as predictors ranged from three to five, with one keyword, 'griep' ('flu'), having the most weight in all models.DiscussionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of accurate, real-time ILI incidence predictions in the Netherlands using Google search query data.

Indexed as

Data CollectionDisease OutbreaksHumansIncidenceInfluenza, HumanInternetModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalNetherlandsPopulation SurveillanceSearch EngineSeasonsUnited Statesdigital epidemiologyinfectious diseasesinfluenza-like illnessmachine learningsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32489174
PMCPMC7268271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.