Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32489103›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2021

A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain.

Bonnie Wiggins, Kim Anastasiou, David N Cox

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bonnie WigginsNutrition and Health, Health and Biosecurity, 2221CSIRO, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-9817
Kim AnastasiouNutrition and Health, Health and Biosecurity, 2221CSIRO, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
David N CoxNutrition and Health, Health and Biosecurity, 2221CSIRO, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the factors associated with synergistic multisector alliances in the public health domain. DATA SOURCE: Articles in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar between March 2009 and February 2019 were searched. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Included alliances had a public health and behavioral focus, were from the public or private sector, and were multipartner and multisector, and from high-income countries. Public health research alliances were included, but clinical research alliances were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction included alliance description, alliance domain, country, single or multiple alliances, and the sectors included in the alliance. Two theoretical frameworks were used in data extraction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were coded according to 28 factors representing antecedents, management, and evaluation (Parent and Harvey model) and 3 output-specific factors (Bergen model).

resultsA final 24 papers were included, of which 58% contained synergistic alliances. While almost all factors reportedly enabled synergy, some factors were more frequently associated with synergistic alliances, including clear purpose and positive coordination, information sharing, and evaluation of project outcomes. Complexity within some factors was also reported.

conclusionThe theoretical models were supported by the data. Public health alliances would likely benefit from incorporating factors identified as beneficial for synergy and from carefully considering the management of complex factors.

Indexed as

Public HealthHumansalliancecollaborationevaluationhealth promotionmultisector partnershipspublic health and literature reviewsynergy

Identifiers

PMID32489103
PMCPMC7747138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.