Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488958›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

Analysis of clinical features and outcomes of 161 patients with severe and critical COVID-19: A multicenter descriptive study.

Ming Shi, Lianhua Chen, Yadong Yang, Jingpeng Zhang, Ji Xu, Gang Xu, Bin Li, Yiping Yin

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19: rapid review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The spatiotemporal trend of renal involvement in COVID-19: A pooled analysis of 17 134 patients.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ming ShiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Dongfeng Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Lianhua ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Yadong YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang, China.
Jingpeng ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang, China.
Ji XuDepartmen of Critical Care Medicine, Qichun People's Hospital, Qichun, China.
Gang XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Wuxue People's Hospital, Wuxue, China.
Bin LiDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Huanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang, China.
Yiping YinDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-4260
Huanggang Central Hospital · CNHubei University of Medicine · CNQihe People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics, laboratory indexes, treatment regimens, and short-term outcomes of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

methodsOne hundred and sixty one consecutive severe and critical COVID-19 patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) were retrospectively reviewed in this multicenter study. Demographic features, medical histories, clinical symptoms, lung computerized tomography (CT) findings, and laboratory indexes on admission were collected. Post-admission complications, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes were also documented.

resultsThe mean age was 59.38 ± 16.54 years, with 104 (64.60%) males and 57 (35.40%) females. Hypertension (44 [27.33%]) and diabetes were the most common medical histories. Fever (127 [78.88%]) and dry cough (111 [68.94%]) were the most common symptoms. Blood routine indexes, hepatic and renal function indexes, and inflammation indexes were commonly abnormal. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was the most common post-admission complication (69 [42.86%]), followed by electrolyte disorders (48 [29.81%]), multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) (37 [22.98%]), and hypoproteinemia (36 [22.36%]). The most commonly used antiviral drug was lopinavir/ritonavir tablet. 50 (31.06%) patients died, while 78 (48.45%) patients healed and discharged, and the last 33 (20.50%) patients remained in hospital. Besides, the mean hospital stay of deaths was 21.66 ± 11.18 days, while the mean hospital stay of discharged patients was 18.42 ± 12.77 days. Furthermore, ARDS (P < .001) and MODS (P = .008) correlated with increased mortality rate.

conclusionSevere and critical COVID-19 presents with high mortality rate, and occurrence of ARDS or MODS greatly increases its mortality risk.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedAge FactorsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Treatment Outcomeclinical featuresclinical outcomesCOVID-19laboratory indexespost-admission complications

Identifiers

PMID32488958
PMCPMC7300573
OpenAlexW3031342190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.