ArticleThe oncologist2020
Defining Treatment-Related Adverse Effects in Patients with Glioma: Distinctive Features of Pseudoprogression and Treatment-Induced Necrosis.
Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics in glioblastoma recurrence: advances in prediction, localization, and differentiation from treatment-related effects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) CEST MRI in clinical routine for single time point diagnosis of pseudoprogression in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- A Mechanistic Model of Brain Necrosis Progression Based on Vascular Heterogeneity.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Brain volume loss after cranial irradiation: a controlled comparison study between photon vs proton radiotherapy for WHO grade 2-3 gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Decoding Patient Heterogeneity Influencing Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Histopathologically confirmed radiation-induced damage of the brain - an in-depth analysis of radiation parameters and spatio-temporal occurrence.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- Incidence and characteristics of pseudoprogression in IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas: A POLA network study.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Histopathology and surgical outcome of symptomatic treatment-related changes after gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Durable benefit and change in TCR clonality with nivolumab in a Lynch syndrome-associated glioma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Advanced Imaging Techniques for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Gliomas.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Resolution of radiation necrosis with bevacizumab following radiation therapy for primary CNS lymphoma.Oncotarget · 2022Article
- Advanced MRI Protocols to Discriminate Glioma From Treatment Effects: State of the Art and Future Directions.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- Subventricular zone involvement is associated with worse outcome in glioma WHO grade 2 depending on molecular markers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Intracranial Foreign Body Granuloma Mimicking Brain Tumor Recurrence: A Case Series.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy outperforms perfusion in distinguishing between pseudoprogression and disease progression in patients with glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Limited evidence of pseudoprogression following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Combination laser interstitial thermal therapy plus stereotactic radiotherapy increases time to progression for biopsy-proven recurrent brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPseudoprogression (PP) and treatment-induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging cancer treatment-related effects. Both phenomena remain insufficiently defined; differentiation from recurrent disease frequently necessitates tissue biopsy. We here characterize distinctive features of PP and TN to facilitate noninvasive diagnosis and clinical management. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with glioma and confirmed PP (defined as appearance <5 months after radiotherapy [RT] completion) or TN (>5 months after RT) were retrospectively compared using clinical, radiographic, and histopathological data. Each imaging event/lesion (region of interest [ROI]) diagnosed as PP or TN was longitudinally evaluated by serial imaging.
resultsWe identified 64 cases of mostly (80%) biopsy-confirmed PP (n = 27) and TN (n = 37), comprising 137 ROIs in total. Median time of onset for PP and TN was 1 and 11 months after RT, respectively. Clinically, PP occurred more frequently during active antineoplastic treatment, necessitated more steroid-based interventions, and was associated with glioblastoma (81 vs. 40%), fewer IDH1 mutations, and shorter median overall survival. Radiographically, TN lesions often initially manifested periventricularly (n = 22/37; 60%), were more numerous (median, 2 vs. 1 ROIs), and contained fewer malignant elements upon biopsy. By contrast, PP predominantly developed around the tumor resection cavity as a non-nodular, ring-like enhancing structure. Both PP and TN lesions almost exclusively developed in the main prior radiation field. Presence of either condition appeared to be associated with above-average overall survival.
conclusionPP and TN occur in clinically distinct patient populations and exhibit differences in spatial radiographic pattern. Increased familiarity with both conditions and their unique features will improve patient management and may avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment-induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging treatment-related effects mimicking tumor progression in patients with brain cancer. Affected patients frequently require surgery to guide management. PP and TN remain arbitrarily defined and insufficiently characterized. Lack of clear diagnostic criteria compromises treatment and may adversely affect outcome interpretation in clinical trials. The present findings in a cohort of patients with glioma with PP/TN suggest that both phenomena exhibit unique clinical and imaging characteristics, manifest in different patient populations, and should be classified as distinct clinical conditions. Increased familiarity with PP and TN key features may guide clinicians toward timely noninvasive diagnosis, circumvent potentially unnecessary surgical procedures, and improve response assessment in neuro-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.