Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488898›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2020

Motives and barriers to initiation and sustained exercise adherence in a fitness club setting-A one-year follow-up study.

Christina Gjestvang, Frank Abrahamsen, Trine Stensrud, Lene A H Haakstad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05792657 (The ABEL Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05792657 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The ABEL Feasibility Study (Adherence, Better Health, Exercise and Life Satisfaction): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorges idrettshøgskoleRan2023 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsObesityArmsHigh dosage in-person exercise coaching, Medium dosage in-person exercise coaching., Low dosage in-person exercise coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina GjestvangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-1921
Frank AbrahamsenDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-525X
Trine StensrudDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Lene A H HaakstadDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No prospective studies have investigated motives and barriers to exercise in new untrained fitness club members. The aims of the present prospective longitudinal study were to (a) examine proportions reporting regular exercise, non-regular exercise, and exercise dropout; (b) identify motives and barriers to exercise; and (c) compare motives between regular and non-regular exercisers the first year of fitness club membership. New members (n = 250) were followed for 1 year. A questionnaire including demographics, exercise frequency, motives (EMI-2), and barriers (18 common reported barriers) was used, and 184 answered at four time points (onset, and after 3, 6, and 12 months). Participants were categorized into regular exercise: ≥2 sessions/wk or non-regular exercise: ≤1 session/wk, exercise relapse, or dropout. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 63.4%, 59.6%, and 57.2% exercised regularly, whereas 20.1%, 21.1%, and 28.3%, dropped out, respectively. Throughout the follow-up, 37% reported regular exercise. At all time points, motives regarding positive health and strength/endurance were rated highest on a six-point scale. Exercise dropouts rated priority as the greatest barrier. Regular exercisers rated the motives enjoyment (such as "I enjoy the feeling of exerting myself") and challenge (such as "To give me goals to work towards") higher than non-regular exercisers (P = ≤.05). In conclusion, less than half exercised regularly, and most members were motivated by factors such as positive health and physical fitness the first year of fitness club membership. Higher levels of the motives enjoyment and challenge were associated with regular exercise.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthMotivationAdultExerciseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesadherencebarriersexercisefitness club membersfitness clubsmotives

Identifiers

PMID32488898
PMCPMC7497044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.