Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2020
Effect of a new respiratory care bundle on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-frequency oscillatory ventilation with volume guarantee in infants: a systematic review.Pediatric research · 2025Pooled it
- Gas transport mechanisms during high-frequency ventilation.Respiratory research · 2024Review
- Comparison of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilators.Respiratory care · 2024Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: quality improvement using a maximal lung protection strategy and early surgery-improved survival.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Respiratory Care of Big Data Communication to Prevent Respiratory Tract Infection Nursing Analysis of Patients with Heart Failure.BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of devices that can fix the tidal volume in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) has allowed for a significant improvement in the management of HFOV. At our institution, this had led to the earlier use of HFOV and promoted a change in the treatment strategy involving the use of higher frequencies (above 15 Hz) and lower high-frequency tidal volumes (VThf). The purpose of this observational study was to assess how survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia grades 2 and 3 (SF-BPD) is influenced by these modifications in the respiratory strategy applied to preterm infants (gestational age < 32 weeks at birth) who required mechanical ventilation (MV) in the first 3 days of life. We compared a baseline period (2012-2013) against a period in which this strategy had been fully implemented (2016-2017). A total of 182 patients were exposed to MV in the first 3 days of life being a higher proportion on HFOV at day 3 in the second period 79.5% (n 35) in 2016-2017 vs 55.4% (n 31) in 2012-2013. After adjusting for perinatal risk factors, the second period is associated with an increased rate of SF-BPD (OR 2.28; CI 95% 1.072-4.878); this effect is more evident in neonates born at a gestational age of less than 29 weeks (OR 4.87; 95% CI 1.9-12.48).Conclusions : The early use of HFOV combined with the use of higher frequencies and very low VT was associated with an increase in the study population's SF-BPD. What is Known: • High-frequency ventilation with volume guarantee improve ventilation stability and has been shown to reduce lung damage in animal models. What is New: • The strategy of an earlier use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with the use of higher frequencies and lower tidal volume is associated to an increase in survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in our population of preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.