ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021
Evaluation of a new wireless technique for continuous electroencephalography monitoring in neurological intensive care patients.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive mobile EEG as a tool for seizure monitoring and management: A systematic review.Epilepsia · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Point-of-Care Electroencephalography in Acute Neurological Care: A Narrative Review.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Article
- Automated Seizure Detection in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Review of Ceribell™ Rapid-EEG Recordings.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Continuous EEG monitoring by a new simplified wireless headset in intensive care unit.BMC anesthesiology · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel wireless eight-channel electroencephalography (EEG) headset specially developed for ICUs was tested in regard of comparability with standard 10/20 EEG systems. The continuous EEG (cEEG) derivations via CerebAir EEG headset (Nihon Kohden Europe, Rosbach, Germany) and internationally standardized 10/20 reference EEGs as the diagnostic standard were performed in a mixed collective on a neurointensive care unit (neuro-ICU). The derivations were verified for comparability in detection of EEG background activity, epileptiform discharges, and seizure patterns. Fifty-two patients with vigilance reduction following serious neurological or metabolic diseases were included, and both methods were applied and further analyzed in 47. EEG background activity matched in 24 of 45 patients (53%; p = 0.126), epileptiform discharges matched in 32 (68%) patients (p = 0.162), and seizure activity matched in 98%. Overall, in 89% of the patients, cEEG detected the same or additional ICU-relevant EEG patterns. The tested wireless cEEG headset is a useful monitoring tool in patients with consciousness disorders. The present study indicates that long-term measurements with the wireless eight-channel cEEG lead to a higher seizure and epileptiform discharge detection compared to intermittent 10/20 EEG derivations in the ICU setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.