Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488664›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2020

Haemostatic Efficacy of Topical Agents During Liver Resection: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.

Cameron I Wells, Chathura B B Ratnayake, Keno Mentor, Gourab Sen, John S Hammond, Jeremy J French, Colin H Wilson, Derek Manas, Steve White, Sanjay Pandanaboyana

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Minimizing blood loss and transfusion rate in laparoscopic liver surgery: a review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cameron I WellsDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-6674
Chathura B B RatnayakeDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Keno MentorHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gourab SenHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
John S HammondHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jeremy J FrenchHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Colin H WilsonHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Derek ManasHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Steve WhiteHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sanjay PandanaboyanaHPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Sanjay.pandanaboyana@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-2197
Freeman Hospital · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatic resection carries a high risk of parenchymal bleeding both intra- and post-operatively. Topical haemostatic agents are frequently used to control bleeding during hepatectomy, with multiple products currently available. However, it remains unknown which of these is most effective for achieving haemostasis and improving peri-operative outcomes.

methodsA systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials investigating topical haemostatic agents in hepatic resection was performed. Interventions were analysed by grouping into similar products; fibrin patch, fibrin glue, collagen products, and control. Primary outcomes were the rate of haemostasis at 4 and 10 min.

resultsTwenty randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis, including a total of 3267 patients and 7 different interventions. Fibrin glue and fibrin patch were the most effective interventions for achieving haemostasis at both 4 and 10 min. There were no significant differences between haemostatic agents with respect to blood loss, transfusion requirements, bile leak, post-operative complications, reoperation, or mortality.

conclusionsAmongst the haemostatic agents currently available, fibrin patch and fibrin glue are the most effective methods for reducing time to haemostasis during liver resection, but have no effect on other peri-operative outcomes. Topical haemostatic agents should not be used routinely, but may be a useful adjunct to achieve haemostasis when needed.

Indexed as

HemostaticsHepatectomyBayes TheoremFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHemostasisHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID32488664
OpenAlexW3028750177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.