ArticleThe AAPS journal2020
Development of a Highly Specific Anti-drug Antibody Assay in Support of a Nanoparticle-based Therapeutic.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PEGylated biotherapeutics can elicit anti-PEG (polyethylene glycol) immune responses in patients treated with this category of drugs. While anti-PEG antibody assays for this class of biotherapeutics have become a common element of the clinical immunogenicity testing strategy, the overall antibody incidence induced by the nanoparticle (NP) delivery system (such as ACCURINS®) has not been fully studied to date. To support the immunogenicity assessment of one of Pfizer's NP-based therapeutics, consisting of gedatolisib (GEDA) encapsulated in ACCURINS® (GEDA-NP), we developed an anti-GEDA-NP antibody (ADA) assay on the MSD platform for the detection of GEDA-NP induced ADA in human serum. The focus of our strategy was on developing a clinically relevant ADA assay and systematically addressing assay interference through rigorous assay optimization. Our efforts led to a fit-for-purpose assay for the detection of anti-GEDA-NP ADA in serum samples obtained from breast cancer patients. Results from method qualification indicated robust assay performance, as highlighted by inter and intra-assay precision within 25% CV for all controls, and reproducible response profiles across multiple runs during the assessment of assay cut points with breast cancer samples. The assay sensitivity was between 4.3 ng/mL and 123 ng/mL for surrogate positive controls of IgG and IgM isotypes, respectively. Additionally, assay interference from nonspecific matrix proteins and circulating drug was addressed, which ensured accurate assessment of ADA incidence that can be attributed to GEDA-NP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.