Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488621›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2020

Morphologic Variants of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinicopathologic Analysis and Prognostic Stratification.

Yue Xue, Michelle D Reid, Burcin Pehlivanoglu, Rebecca C Obeng, Hongmei Jiang, Bahar Memis, Shu K Lui, Juan Sarmiento, David Kooby, Shishir K Maithel and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue XueDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Emory University Hospital, (Currently) Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michelle D ReidDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Emory University Hospital, (Currently) Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Burcin PehlivanogluDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Emory University Hospital, (Currently) Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rebecca C ObengDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Emory University Hospital, (Currently) Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hongmei JiangDepartment of Statistics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bahar MemisDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Emory University Hospital, (Currently) Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shu K LuiDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Emory University Hospital, (Currently) Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Juan SarmientoDepartment of Surgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David KoobyDepartment of Surgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shishir K MaithelDepartment of Surgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bassel El-RayesDepartment of Oncology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Olca BasturkDepartment of Pathology, (Previously) Wayne State University, (Currently) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Davutpaşa Caddesi No: 4, Topkapı, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey. vadsay@kuh.ku.edu.tr.
Emory University Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USKoç University · TRWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better prognostication/stratification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is needed. In this detailed morpheomic study of 163 resected PanNETs, 11 unusual variants, some of which were not previously recognized, and others scarcely documented in the literature, were identified, and their pathologic characteristics were further analyzed. By behavior and clinicopathologic associations, these variants could be grouped into three prognostically different categories. I. More aggressive (20%). Included in this group were the variants that in average showed higher grade and stage and adverse outcome including oncocytic, plasmacytoid, lipid-rich and previously unrecognized hepatoid variants, which often had a more diffuse/broad-band growth pattern, with some also displaying discohesiveness. They were characterized by abundant cytoplasm and often had prominent nucleoli (as seen in metabolically active cells), thus the provisional name "metabolic cell phenotype." Because of their diversion from classical neuroendocrine cytomorphology, these variants created challenges on original diagnostic workup, particularly hepatoid examples, which revealed Arginase 1/Hep Par-1 expression in 50%. II. Less aggressive (10%). These cases either showed signs of maturation, including nested growth, paraganglioid pattern (which was previously unrecognized), and organoid PanNETs such as "ductulo-insular" growth, or showed symplastic/degenerative changes, and despite their paradoxically disconcerting histology, were more benevolent in behavior. III. Undetermined. There were other variants including mammary tubulolobular-like, pseudoglandular, peliotic, and sclerotic PanNETs, which although diagnostically challenging, their biologic significance could not be determined because of rarity or heterogeneous characteristics. Prognostic associations: Features that were significantly different in the more aggressive group than the less aggressive group were median size (5.0 vs 1.6 cm, p < 0.001), percentage of pT3+T4 cases (72% vs 12%, p < 0.001), Ki67 index (5.3% vs 2.3%, p = 0.001), % G2 and G3 cases (77% vs 27%, p < 0.001), and rate of lymph node and distant metastasis (96% vs 27%, p < 0.001). In stepwise logistic regression model using the 3 established prognosticators of T stage, size, and grade along with morphology, only aggressive-morphology (metabolic cell phenotype) was found to be associated with metastatic behavior with an odds ratio of 5.9 with 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 1.688 to 22.945 and p value 0.007. In conclusion, PanNETs display various morphologic patterns that are not only challenging and important diagnostically but appear to have biologic significance. Tumors with more diffuse growth of cells with nucleoli and abundant cytoplasm and/or discohesion (oncocytic, hepatoid, lipid-rich, plasmacytoid PanNETs), provisionally termed "metabolic cell phenotype," show aggressive characteristics and are an independent determinant of adverse outcome and thus may require closer post-surgical follow-up, whereas variants with more degenerative or mature features (ductuloinsular, pleomorphic, paraganglioma-like) appear to be more benevolent despite their more atypical and worrisome morphology.

Indexed as

AgedCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine TumorsOrgan SizePancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPhenotypeClinicopathologic featuresMorphologic variantsWell-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID32488621
OpenAlexW3030886020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.