Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488598›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Generalization of novel sensorimotor associations among pianists and non-pianists: more evidence that musical training effects are constrained.

Peter Q Pfordresher, Chihiro Honda, Emma Greenspon, Karen Chow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter Q PfordresherDepartment of Psychology, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA. pqp@buffalo.edu.
Chihiro HondaDepartment of Psychology, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Emma GreensponDepartment of Psychology, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Karen ChowDepartment of Psychology, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of acquiring musical skills, such as playing the piano, we develop sensorimotor associations between motor movements and perception of pitch. Previous research suggests that these acquired associations are relatively inflexible and show limited generalizability to performance under novel conditions. The current study investigated whether piano training constrains the ability to generalize learning based on an unfamiliar (inverted) pitch mapping, using a transfer-of-training paradigm (Palmer and Meyer in Psychol Sci 11:63-68, 2000). Pianists and non-pianists learned a training melody by ear with normal (higher pitches to the right) or inverted (higher pitches to the left) pitch mapping. After training, participants completed a generalization test in which they listened to and then immediately reproduced four types of melodies that varied in their similarity to the melody used during training and were based on the same, a similar, an inverted, or a different pitch pattern. The feedback mapping during the generalization test matched training. Overall, pianists produced fewer errors and required fewer training trials than non-pianists. However, benefits of training were absent for pianists who trained with inverted feedback when they attempted to reproduce a melody with a different structure than the melody used for training. This suggests that piano experience may constrain one's ability to generalize learning that is based on novel sensorimotor associations.

Indexed as

MusicAuditory PerceptionHumansLearning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.