Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488595›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

First postoperative day review in eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy, encirclement and endotamponade to check intraocular pressure: Is it necessary?

Craig Wilde, Palvi Bhardwaj, Anthony King, Dharmalingam Kumudhan, Alex Foss, Gavin Orr, Anwar Zaman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06707168 (ACCURACY of DIGITAL INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT AT the END of PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY SURGERY), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06707168 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

ACCURACY of DIGITAL INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT AT the END of PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY SURGERY

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsPars Plana VitrectomyArmsDigital palpation, Cotton-tipped applicator (CTA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Expansile gas concentration in primary pseudophakic retinal detachment repair, effect on intraocular pressure and outcomes; the Manchester Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment Study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig WildeOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. craig_wilde@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9862-1152
Palvi BhardwajOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Anthony KingOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Dharmalingam KumudhanOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Alex FossOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Gavin OrrOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Anwar ZamanOphthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Queen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the proportion of patients with raised intraocular pressure (IOP) (≥ 30 mmHg) on the first postoperative day following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), encirclement and endotamponade and assess the number requiring alteration in management to address elevated IOP. To establish whether review on day one is required.

methodsRetrospective case note review of consecutive patients who underwent 23-gauge PPV, 276-encirclement and endotamponade under the care of a single surgeon. All patients as standard received prophylactic anti-glaucoma medication post-surgery (eye drops) to take home but initiate only after day-one review. Statistical analysis was carried out using student t tests and Fisher's exact tests.

resultsSixty-six patients were examined over a 2-year period. Mean day-one IOP was 22.2 mmHg (SD 7.3, 95% CI 20.4-24.0). Eleven patients (16.7%) had IOP ≥ 30 mmHg. Five patients (7.6%) had management changing decisions made at the day-one postoperative visit. Lens status, endotamponade, preoperative IOP, surgeon grade, cryopexy versus laser retinopexy or preoperative administration of once only 500 mg dose of intravenous acetazolamide did not influence IOP, with no significant difference between these subgroups. No cases of hypotony occurred.

conclusionsA significant minority of patients had elevation of IOP above 30 mmHg, a number of whom required treatment changes to address this. No preoperative risk factors were identified indicating those at risk of high IOP. It is important to identify these potentially harmful IOP elevations, and therefore day-one review is imperative and should be continued.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureVitrectomyEndotamponadeHumansRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularEncirclementIntraocular pressurePostoperative reviewRetinal detachmentVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32488595
OpenAlexW3030362717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.