Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488580›Full record

SynthesisHeart failure reviews2022

Diagnostic value of echocardiographic markers for diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Elisa Dal Canto, Sharon Remmelzwaal, Adriana Johanne van Ballegooijen, M Louis Handoko, Stephane Heymans, Vanessa van Empel, Walter J Paulus, Giel Nijpels, Petra Elders, Joline Wj Beulens

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Left atrial longitudinal strain analysis in long Covid-19 syndrome.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa Dal CantoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8999-9946
Sharon RemmelzwaalDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriana Johanne van BallegooijenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M Louis HandokoDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephane HeymansDepartment of Cardiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Vanessa van EmpelDepartment of Cardiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Walter J PaulusDepartment of Physiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giel NijpelsDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petra EldersDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joline Wj BeulensDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.beulens@amsterdamumc.nl.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of echocardiographic markers of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in comparison with the gold standard of cardiac catheterization. Diagnosing HFpEF is challenging, as symptoms are non-specific and often absent at rest. A clear need exists for sensitive echocardiographic markers to diagnose HFpEF. We systematically searched for studies testing the diagnostic value of novel echocardiographic markers for HFpEF and LVDD. Two investigators independently reviewed the studies and assessed the risk of bias. Results were meta-analysed when four or more studies reported a similar diagnostic measure. Of 353 studies, 20 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was high especially in the patients' selection domain. The highest diagnostic performance was demonstrated by a multivariable model combining echocardiographic, clinical and arterial function markers with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98). A meta-analysis of four studies indicated a reasonable diagnostic performance for left atrial strain with an AUC of 0.83 (0.70-0.95), a specificity of 93% (95% CI, 90-97%) and a sensitivity of 77% (95% CI, 59-96%). Moreover, the addition of exercise E/e' improved the sensitivity of HFpEF diagnostic algorithms up to 90%, compared with 60 and 34% of guidelines alone. Despite the heterogeneity of the included studies, this review supported the current multivariable-based approach for the diagnosis of HFpEF and LVDD and showed a potential diagnostic role for exercise echocardiography and left atrial strain. Larger well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the incremental value of novel diagnostic tools to current diagnostic algorithms.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftEchocardiographyHumansStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftDiastolic dysfunctionEchocardiographyHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32488580
PMCPMC8739319
OpenAlexW3030134494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.