Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488500›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020

Evaluation of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula using multiplanar reformation in MDCT: correlation with ERCP findings.

Christopher Silman, Shunro Matsumoto, Yasunari Yamada, Yankel Sena, Norio Hongo, Ryo Takaji, Maki Kiyonaga, Ryo Ogawa, Kazuhisa Okamoto, Kazunari Murakami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher SilmanDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan. silmanchristopher@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4253-2457
Shunro MatsumotoDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Yasunari YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Yankel SenaDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Norio HongoDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Ryo TakajiDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Maki KiyonagaDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Ryo OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Kazuhisa OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Kazunari MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Oita University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MPR-MDCT) to identify and classify the juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum (JPDD), with ERCP findings as the gold standard.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all ERCP examinations (n: 455) performed between January 2010 to December 2018 and selected 105 patients with JPDD as the inclusion criteria. Of those, 28 patients were excluded because of advanced pancreatic carcinoma, incomplete MDCT examinations and biliary catheter insertion. Finally, MDCT examinations of 77 patients with JPDD were assessed for the presence and type of JPDD.

resultsMPR-MDCT was able to identify 71 (92.2%) JPDD in 77 cases with 88.9% accuracy, 83.3% sensitivity, and 91.6% specificity in classifying the type of JPDD. MPR-MDCT performed best in determining type 1 JPDD, with accuracy of 95.4% compared with type 2 (83.3%) and type 3 (87.8%). There was no significant difference between age, gender, incidence of biliary stones and pancreatitis between each type of JPDD. No correlation of sizes with types of JPDD was found.

conclusionsMPR-MDCT can accurately identify and classify JPDD. This information will be useful in determining the difficulty of ERCP.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeMultidetector Computed TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overDiverticulumDuodenal DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCommon bile ductDiverticulumEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyMultidetector computed tomographyMultiplanar reformation

Identifiers

PMID32488500
OpenAlexW3030691726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.