ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Novel radiomics features from CCTA images for the functional evaluation of significant ischaemic lesions based on the coronary fractional flow reserve score.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Machine Learning Models in Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events Prediction Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Quality assessment of radiomics research in cardiac CT: a systematic review.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Functional Coronary Artery Assessment: a Systematic Literature Review.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Pooled it
- Patient-level CAD-RADS scoring from coronary radiomic features.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Risk prediction for elderly cognitive impairment by radiomic and morphological quantification analysis based on a cerebral MRA imaging cohort.European radiology · 2025Article
- Beyond plaque segmentation: a combined radiomics-deep learning approach for automated CAD-RADS classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Novel Data Augmentation Method for Radiomics Analysis Using Image Perturbations.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- A Scoping Review of Machine-Learning Derived Radiomic Analysis of CT and PET Imaging to Investigate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Imaging biomarkers in cardiac CT: moving beyond simple coronary anatomical assessment.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology and Atherosclerosis in the Context of Precision Medicine: A Scoping Review.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2024Article
- The incremental value of CCTA-derived myocardial radiomics signature for ischemia diagnosis with reference to CT myocardial perfusion imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- A robust radiomic-based machine learning approach to detect cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac computed tomography.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in coronary computed tomography angiography: Demands and solutions from a clinical perspective.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Prediction of myocardial ischemia in coronary heart disease patients using a CCTA-Based radiomic nomogram.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiac computed tomography radiomics: a narrative review of current status and future directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Review
- Exploring the diagnostic effectiveness for myocardial ischaemia based on CCTA myocardial texture features.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Texture analysis of delayed contrast-enhanced computed tomography to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the superiority of radiomics analysis in the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for identifying myocardial ischaemia and predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 105 lesions from 88 patients who underwent CCTA and invasive fractional flow reserve measurement were collected as the training set, and another 31 patients with CCTA and clinical outcome information were used as the validation set. Conventional CCTA features included the stenosis diameter, length, Agatston score and high-risk plaque characteristics. After extracting and selecting radiomics features, the robustness of the radiomics features was examined, and then conventional and radiomics models were established using logistic regressions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Net Reclassification Index (NRI) were analysed to compare the discrimination and classification abilities between the two models in both the training and validation sets. A total of 1409 radiomics features were extracted, and three wavelet features were finally screened out. The robustness test showed good stability for the refined radiomics features. Compared with the conventional model, the radiomics model displayed a significantly improved diagnostic performance in the training set (AUC 0.762 vs. 0.631, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.671-0.853 vs. 0.519-0.742, P = 0.058) but a slightly improved diagnostic performance in the validation set (AUC 0.671 vs. 0.592, 95% CI 0.466-0.875 vs. 0.519-0.742, P = 0.448). The NRI of the radiomics model was increased in both the training and validation sets (NRI 0.198 and 0.238, respectively). Quantitative radiomics analysis was feasible and might help to improve the diagnostic performance of CCTA but is still controversial for predicting MACE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.