Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488454›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Novel radiomics features from CCTA images for the functional evaluation of significant ischaemic lesions based on the coronary fractional flow reserve score.

Wenchao Hu, Xiangjun Wu, Di Dong, Long-Biao Cui, Min Jiang, Jibin Zhang, Yabin Wang, Xinjiang Wang, Lei Gao, Jie Tian and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenchao Hu *Second Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangjun Wu *School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Di DongSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Long-Biao CuiSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Min JiangSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jibin ZhangSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yabin WangSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinjiang WangSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei GaoSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie TianCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. jie.tian@ia.ac.cn.
Feng CaoSecond Medical Center & National Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. fengcao8828@163.com.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China (CN) 2016YFA0100903National Key R&D Program of China (CN) 2017YFA0205200, 2017YFC1309100, 2017YFA0700401National Key R&D Program of China (CN) 2017YFC1308700National Natural Science Foundation of China 81227901National Natural Science Foundation of China 81530058National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971776, 81771924Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L182061Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 2017175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the superiority of radiomics analysis in the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for identifying myocardial ischaemia and predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 105 lesions from 88 patients who underwent CCTA and invasive fractional flow reserve measurement were collected as the training set, and another 31 patients with CCTA and clinical outcome information were used as the validation set. Conventional CCTA features included the stenosis diameter, length, Agatston score and high-risk plaque characteristics. After extracting and selecting radiomics features, the robustness of the radiomics features was examined, and then conventional and radiomics models were established using logistic regressions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Net Reclassification Index (NRI) were analysed to compare the discrimination and classification abilities between the two models in both the training and validation sets. A total of 1409 radiomics features were extracted, and three wavelet features were finally screened out. The robustness test showed good stability for the refined radiomics features. Compared with the conventional model, the radiomics model displayed a significantly improved diagnostic performance in the training set (AUC 0.762 vs. 0.631, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.671-0.853 vs. 0.519-0.742, P = 0.058) but a slightly improved diagnostic performance in the validation set (AUC 0.671 vs. 0.592, 95% CI 0.466-0.875 vs. 0.519-0.742, P = 0.448). The NRI of the radiomics model was increased in both the training and validation sets (NRI 0.198 and 0.238, respectively). Quantitative radiomics analysis was feasible and might help to improve the diagnostic performance of CCTA but is still controversial for predicting MACE.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsCoronary artery diseaseCT angiographyMyocardial ischaemiaRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32488454
OpenAlexW3028755854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.