Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488372›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

Radiogenomics model for overall survival prediction of glioblastoma.

Navodini Wijethilake, Mobarakol Islam, Hongliang Ren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancing Precision Medicine: Algebraic Topology and Differential Geometry in Radiology and Computational Pathology.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A prognostic gene signature for gastric cancer and the immune infiltration-associated mechanism underlying the signature gene, PLG.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Ten-NFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Navodini WijethilakeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mobarakol IslamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hongliang RenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. ren@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

Singapore Academic Research Fund R-397-000-297-114The National Medical Research Council R-397-000-245-511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a very aggressive and infiltrative brain tumor with a high mortality rate. There are radiomic models with handcrafted features to estimate glioblastoma prognosis. In this work, we evaluate to what extent of combining genomic with radiomic features makes an impact on the prognosis of overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM. We apply a hypercolumn-based convolutional network to segment tumor regions from magnetic resonance images (MRI), extract radiomic features (geometric, shape, histogram), and fuse with gene expression profiling data to predict survival rate for each patient. Several state-of-the-art regression models such as linear regression, support vector machine, and neural network are exploited to conduct prognosis analysis. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset of MRI and gene expression profiling is used in the study to observe the model performance in radiomic, genomic, and radiogenomic features. The results demonstrate that genomic data are correlated with the GBM OS prediction, and the radiogenomic model outperforms both radiomic and genomic models. We further illustrate the most significant genes, such as IL1B, KLHL4, ATP1A2, IQGAP2, and TMSL8, which contribute highly to prognosis analysis. Graphical Abstract Our Proposed fully automated "Radiogenomic"" approach for survival prediction overview. It fuses geometric, intensity, volumetric, genomic and clinical information to predict OS.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisSurvival RateTranscriptomeBrain tumor segmentationConvolutional neural network (CNN)GlioblastomaHypercolumnPixelNet.Survival prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.