ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020
First-in-human dose: current status review for better future perspectives.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-in-Human Study on Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single Escalating Doses of HEC88473, a Novel Dual GLP-1 and FGF21 Receptor Agonist in Healthy and Obese Chinese Subjects.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Trial
- Risk Management in First-in-Human Trials of Intravenous Drugs: Current Practices and Future Perspectives.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- Design and pharmacological assessment of naproxen-ibuprofen linked NSAIDs as selective COX-2 modulators in inflammatory pathways.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional study on the first-in-human trials of anticancer drugs in Japan and the United States and the probability of approval.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- State of Research on Tissue Engineering with 3D Printing for Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Using Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis to Optimize the Dosing Regimens of Fanastomig (EMB-02) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Academia and industry agreement on a feasibility tool for first-time-in-human clinical trial units.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- CrossFuse-XGBoost: accurate prediction of the maximum recommended daily dose through multi-feature fusion, cross-validation screening and extreme gradient boosting.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Development of consensus-driven SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions for early phase dose-finding trials: the DEFINE study.BMC medicine · 2023Review
- Translatability of preclinical to early clinical tolerable and pharmacologically active dose ranges for central nervous system active drugs.Translational psychiatry · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this article is to understand the pros and cons of various methods involved in first-in-human (FIH) dose calculation and act decisively in dose escalations when calculating the maximum tolerated dose. SUBJECTS AND
methodsWe reviewed early phase clinical trials for methods of FIH dose and dose-escalation steps and discuss them in line with existing guidelines. We also reviewed the clinical trial registry to recognize trends in trial registration in recent years and after a massive failure in a few trials.
resultsPhase 1 trials of TGN 1412 and BIA10-2474 would always be remembered as catastrophes for pharmaceutical development plans. Quite often than not, healthy human volunteers are the guinea pigs in this stage of drug development. And, the most important aspect of designing an early phase study is deciding upon the dose to be started with, apart from the selection of cohort and escalation steps. The common principles used for FIH dose calculation include no observed adverse effect level, minimum anticipated biological effect level, pharmacologically active dose, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach, and similar drug comparison approach.
conclusionEarly phase clinical trials are basically foundation stones on which lies the entire onus of the later stages of development. Deciding FIH dose is a crucial step that necessitates the incorporation of detailed data from the preclinical stages and application of the most conservative approach for the safety/benefit of the volunteers in these studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32488334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.