Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488292›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2020

Effect of hypofractionation on the incidental axilla dose during tangential field radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Kai J Borm, Markus Oechsner, Mathias Düsberg, Gabriel Buschner, Weber Wolfgang, Stephanie E Combs, Marciana N Duma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. De-escalation strategies in early breast cancer: implications of sentinel lymph node biopsy omission for adjuvant radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai J BormDepartment of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Markus OechsnerDepartment of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Mathias DüsbergDepartment of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Gabriel BuschnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Weber WolfgangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Marciana N DumaDepartment of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Marciana-Nona.Duma@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-4411
TUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTangential field irradiation in breast cancer potentially treats residual tumor cells in the axilla after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In recent years, hypofractionated radiotherapy has gained importance and currently represents the recommended standard in adjuvant breast cancer treatment for many patients. So far, the impact of hypofractionation on the effect of incidental lymph node irradiation has not be addressed. MATERIALS AND

methodsBiological effective dose (BED) and tumor control probability (TCP) were estimated for four different hypofractionated radiation schemes (42.50 Gy in 16 fractions [Fx]; 40.05 Gy in 15 Fx; 27 Gy in 5 Fx; and 26 in 5 Fx) and compared to conventional fractionation (50 Gy in 25 Fx). For calculation of BED and TCP, a previously published radiobiological model with an α/β ratio of 4 Gy was used. The theoretical BED and TCP for incidental irradiation between 0 and 100% of the prescribed dose were evaluated. Subsequently, we assessed BED and TCP in 431 axillary lymph node metastases.

resultsThe extent of incidental lymph node irradiation and the fractionation scheme have a direct impact on BED and TCP. The estimated mean TCP in the axillary nodes ranged from 1.5 ± 6.4% to 57.5 ± 22.9%, depending on the patient's anatomy and the fractionation scheme. Hypofractionation led to a significant reduction of mean TCP of lymph node metastases for all schedules.

conclusionOur data indicate that hypofractionation might affect the effectiveness of incidental radiotherapy in the axilla. This is particularly relevant for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes who receive SLNB only.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationAlgorithmsAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyBiological effective doseIncidental axillary doseSentinel nodeTumor control probability

Identifiers

PMID32488292
PMCPMC7450000
OpenAlexW3031280427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.