SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2020
Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Evolution of Phalloplasty for Masculinizing Gender Affirming Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Complications Over the Past 25 Years.Microsurgery · 2026Pooled it
- Postoperative Urogynecologic Complications After Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Narrative Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Impact of Gender-Affirming Surgery on Psychiatric Outcomes and Quality of Life in Transgender Individuals: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Cohort Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Flap Choice in Gender Affirming Phalloplasty Affects Postoperative Complication Rates.Microsurgery · 2026Article
- Rectoneovaginal Fistula After Gender-Affirming Surgery in Transgender Women.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Special Populations in Ambulatory Surgery: Oncologic, Lactating, Transgender and Gender Diverse, and Suicidal Ideation.International anesthesiology clinics · 2025Article
- Feminizing genital gender affirmation surgery: Patient-reported outcomes of urethral flap and classical penile inversion techniques.International journal of transgender health · 2025Article
- Ergonomic Analysis of Dental Work in Different Oral Quadrants: A Motion Capture Preliminary Study among Endodontists.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Urinary complications after penile inversion vaginoplasty in transgender women Systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023Review
- If You Know Them, You Avoid Them: The Imperative Need to Improve the Narrative Regarding Perioperative Adverse Events.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8.International journal of transgender health · 2022Article
- Navigating sociocultural disparities in relation to infection and antibiotic resistance-the need for an intersectional approach.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Review
- Treatment of Urethral Strictures in Transmasculine Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Imaging in Gender Affirmation Surgery.Current urology reports · 2021Review
- [Gender reassignment from female to male : Phalloplasty].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Review
- Postphalloplasty urinary function test: an observational study of novel outcome instrument to capture urinary dysfunction and quality of life after phalloplasty.Asian journal of andrologyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the impact of gender reassignment surgery on the development of urethral complication. A systematic search in accordance the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement for original articles published up until June 2019 was performed using the Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled analyses were done when appropriate. The bibliographic search with the included terms (("Transsexualism"[Mesh])) AND ("Sex Reassignment Surgery"[Mesh]) produced a literature of 879 articles altogether. After removing papers of not interest or articles in which the outcomes could not be deduced, 32 studies were examined for a total of 3463 patients screened. Thirty-two studies met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated, and references were manually reviewed in order to include additional relevant studies in this review. Female-to-male (FtM) surgery and male-to-female (MtF) surgery was discussed in 23 and 10 studies, respectively. One study discussed both. Varying patterns of complications were observed in FtM and MtF surgeries, with increased complications in the former because of the larger size of the neourethra. Meatal stenosis is a particular concern in MtF surgery, with complication rates ranging from 4 to 40%, and usually require meatotomy for repair. Stricture and fistulization are frequently reported complications following FtM surgery. In studies reporting on fistulae involving the urethra, 19-54% of fistulae resolved spontaneously without further surgical intervention. High rates of complications are reported in the current literature, which should be understood by patients and practitioners alike. Shared decision making with patients regarding incidence and management of urethral complications including stricture disease and fistulae, particularly after FtM surgery, is critical for setting expectations and managing postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32488213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.