Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488152›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

General and feature-based semantic representations in the semantic network.

Antonietta Gabriella Liuzzi, Aidas Aglinskas, Scott Laurence Fairhall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Semantic Representational Strength in the Precuneus and Lateral ATL Predicts Successful Factual Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hippocampal Functions Modulate Transfer-Appropriate Cortical Representations Supporting Subsequent Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A tripartite view of the posterior cingulate cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonietta Gabriella LiuzziCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, 38068, Italy. antonietta.liuzzi@unitn.it.
Aidas AglinskasDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Boston, 02467, USA.
Scott Laurence FairhallCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, 38068, Italy.
University of Trento · ITBoston College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How semantic representations are manifest over the brain remains a topic of active debate. A semantic representation may be determined by specific semantic features (e.g. sensorimotor information), or may abstract away from specific features and represent generalized semantic characteristics (general semantic representation). Here we tested whether nodes of the semantic system code for a general semantic representation and/or possess representational spaces linked to particular semantic features. In an fMRI study, eighteen participants performed a typicality judgment task with written words drawn from sixteen different categories. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and representational similarity analysis (RSA) were adopted to investigate the sensitivity of the brain regions to semantic content and the type of semantic representation coded (general or feature-based). We replicated previous findings of sensitivity to general semantic similarity in posterior middle/inferior temporal gyrus (pMTG/ITG) and precuneus (PC) and additionally observed general semantic representations in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (PFC). Finally, two brain regions of the semantic network were sensitive to semantic features: the left pMTG/ITG was sensitive to haptic perception and the left ventral temporal cortex (VTC) to size. This finding supports the involvement of both general semantic representation and feature-based representations in the brain's semantic system.

Identifiers

PMID32488152
PMCPMC7265368
OpenAlexW3029163648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.