ArticleScientific reports2020
Simultaneous identification of animal-derived components in meats using high-throughput sequencing in combination with a custom-built mitochondrial genome database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of mitochondrialFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Molecular Phylogenetic Trees by an Information-Theoretic Metric.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Analysis of non-halal meat adulteration in beef meatball using real-time PCR and mitochondrial D-loop gen-specific primer.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- 18S ribosomal DNA-based PCR test for avian and mammalian DNA identification in meat products.Veterinary and animal science · 2022Article
- A 16S Next Generation Sequencing Based Molecular and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Identify Processed Meat Products Contamination and Mislabelling.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Research progress on detection techniques for point-of-care testing of foodborne pathogens.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the inspection and supervision of animal ingredients relies primarily upon specific amplification-dependent methods, whose efficiency and accuracy are being seriously challenged by the increasing diversity and complexity of meat products. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) technology was employed to develop an alternative method to detect animal-derived ingredients in meat products. A custom-built database containing 2,354 complete mitochondrial genomic sequences from animals, an identification analysis pipeline based on short-sequence alignment, and a web-based server were built to facilitate this detection. The entire process, including DNA extraction, gene amplification, and sequencing, was established and optimized for both marker gene (part of the CYTB gene)-based detection and total DNA-based detection. Using simulated samples containing various levels of pig, cattle, sheep, chicken, rabbit, and mice ingredients, the detection capability and accuracy of this method were investigated. The results of this study indicated that the method is capable of detecting animal components in meats that are present at levels as low as 1%. Our method was then tested using 28 batches of real meat products such as raw meat slices, raw meat mince, cooked dried meat, cooked meat sausage, and other supermarket samples, with a traditional qPCR method as the control. The results demonstrated an accuracy of 97.65% for the qualitative detection method, which indicate that the developed method is reliable for the detection of animal components. The method is also effective for the identification of unknown food samples containing mixed animal components, which suggests a good future in application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.