Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488118›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparative assessment of faecal microbial composition and metabonome of swine, farmers and human control.

Shiang Chiet Tan, Chun Wie Chong, Ivan Kok Seng Yap, Kwai Lin Thong, Cindy Shuan Ju Teh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. WORKbiota: A Systematic Review about the Effects of Occupational Exposure on Microbiota and Workers' Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shiang Chiet TanInstitute of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chun Wie ChongSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Ivan Kok Seng YapSarawak Research and Development Council, 11th Floor LCDA Tower, The Isthmus, Off Jalan Bako, 93050, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Kwai Lin ThongNANOCAT Research Centre, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Cindy Shuan Ju TehDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. cindysjteh@um.edu.my.
University of Malaya · MYForest Department Sarawak · MYInstitute for Medical Research · MYUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tract of humans and swine consist of a wide range of bacteria which interact with hosts metabolism. Due to the differences in co-evolution and co-adaptation, a large fraction of the gut microbiome is host-specific. In this study, we evaluated the effect of close human-animal interaction to the faecal metagenome and metabonome of swine, farmer and human control. Three distinct clusters were observed based on T-RFLP-derived faecal microbial composition. However, 16S-inferred faecal microbiota and metabolic profiles showed that only human control was significantly different from the swine (P < 0.05). The metabonome of farmers and human controls were highly similar. Notably, higher trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and butyrate were detected in human control and swine, respectively. The relative abundance of TMAO was positively correlated with Prevotella copri. Overall, we compared and established the relationship between the metabolites and microbiota composition of swine, farmers and human control. Based on the data obtained, we deduced that long term occupational exposure to swine and farm environment had affected the gut bacterial composition of farmers. Nonetheless, the effect was less prominent in the metabolite profiles, suggesting the gut bacteria expressed high functional plasticity and are therefore resilience to the level of community shift detected.

Indexed as

FarmersAnimalsButyratesCase-Control StudiesFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMalaysiaMetabolomeMetagenomeMethylaminesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSus scrofaButyratesMethylaminesRNA, Ribosomal, 16Strimethyloxamine

Identifiers

PMID32488118
PMCPMC7265441
OpenAlexW3030636364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.