Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488117›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Genome sequence and comparative analysis of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in northern Eurasia.

Melak Weldenegodguad, Kisun Pokharel, Yao Ming, Mervi Honkatukia, Jaana Peippo, Tiina Reilas, Knut H Røed, Juha Kantanen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Inferences about the population history ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The osteometric identification of castrated reindeer (Archaeological and anthropological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. CNVs with adaptive potential inLife science alliance · 2022
    Article
  14. Available names forZooKeys · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Genomics of Adaptations in Ungulates.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Melak Weldenegodguad *Natural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-6353
Kisun Pokharel *Natural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-946X
Yao Ming *BGI-Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518083, China.
Mervi HonkatukiaNatural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Jaana PeippoNatural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Tiina ReilasNatural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Knut H RøedDepartment of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O.Box 369 Centrum, 0102, Oslo, Norway.
Juha KantanenNatural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland. juha.kantanen@luke.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-6373
Natural Resources Institute Finland · FIBGI Group (China) · CNNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reindeer are semi-domesticated ruminants that have adapted to the challenging northern Eurasian environment characterized by long winters and marked annual fluctuations in daylight. We explored the genetic makeup behind their unique characteristics by de novo sequencing the genome of a male reindeer and conducted gene family analyses with nine other mammalian species. We performed a population genomics study of 23 additional reindeer representing both domestic and wild populations and several ecotypes from various geographic locations. We assembled 2.66 Gb (N50 scaffold of 5 Mb) of the estimated 2.92 Gb reindeer genome, comprising 27,332 genes. The results from the demographic history analysis suggested marked changes in the effective population size of reindeer during the Pleistocene period. We detected 160 reindeer-specific and expanded genes, of which zinc finger proteins (n = 42) and olfactory receptors (n = 13) were the most abundant. Comparative genome analyses revealed several genes that may have promoted the adaptation of reindeer, such as those involved in recombination and speciation (PRDM9), vitamin D metabolism (TRPV5, TRPV6), retinal development (PRDM1, OPN4B), circadian rhythm (GRIA1), immunity (CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR4, IFNW1), tolerance to cold-triggered pain (SCN11A) and antler development (SILT2). The majority of these characteristic reindeer genes have been reported for the first time here. Moreover, our population genomics analysis suggested at least two independent reindeer domestication events with genetic lineages originating from different refugial regions after the Last Glacial Maximum. Taken together, our study has provided new insights into the domestication, evolution and adaptation of reindeer and has promoted novel genomic research of reindeer.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBase SequenceBiological EvolutionDomesticationEuropeMaleReceptors, OdorantReindeerSequence Analysis, DNAVitamin DZinc FingersReceptors, OdorantVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32488117
PMCPMC7265531
OpenAlexW3029233841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.