Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488097›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2020

Molecular characterization of a 1p36 chromosomal duplication and in utero interference define ENO1 as a candidate gene for polymicrogyria.

Bilal El Waly, Cécile Mignon-Ravix, Pierre Cacciagli, Emmanuelle Buhler, Bruria Ben Zeev, Laurent Villard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microcephaly GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Genetic Landscape of Polymicrogyria.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bilal El WalyAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France.
Cécile Mignon-RavixAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France.
Pierre CacciagliDépartement de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital d'Enfants de La Timone, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13385, Marseille, France.
Emmanuelle BuhlerInserm, U901, PPGI, 13009, Marseille, France.
Bruria Ben ZeevSheba Medical Center, Pediatric Neurology Unit, 52621, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Laurent VillardAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France. laurent.villard@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6657-5008
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While chromosome 1p36 deletion syndrome is one of the most common terminal subtelomeric microdeletion syndrome, 1p36 microduplications are rare events. Polymicrogyria (PMG) is a brain malformation phenotype frequently present in patients with 1p36 monosomy. The gene whose haploinsufficiency could cause this phenotype remains to be identified. We used high-resolution arrayCGH in patients with various forms of PMG in order to identify chromosomal variants associated to the malformation and characterized the genes included in these regions in vitro and in vivo. We identified the smallest case of 1p36 duplication reported to date in a patient presenting intellectual disability, microcephaly, epilepsy, and perisylvian polymicrogyria. The duplicated segment is intrachromosomal, duplicated in mirror and contains two genes: enolase 1 (ENO1) and RERE, both disrupted by the rearrangement. Gene expression analysis performed using the patient cells revealed a reduced expression, mimicking haploinsufficiency. We performed in situ hybridization to describe the developmental expression profile of the two genes in mouse development. In addition, we used in utero electroporation of shRNAs to show that Eno1 inactivation in the rat causes a brain development defect. These experiments allowed us to define the ENO1 gene as the most likely candidate to contribute to the brain malformation phenotype of the studied patient and consequently a candidate to contribute to the malformations of the cerebral cortex observed in patients with 1p36 monosomy.

Indexed as

Chromosome DuplicationAdultAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBrainChromosomes, Human, Pair 1DNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMiceMicrocephalyNeurogenesisPhosphopyruvate HydratasePolymicrogyriaRatsBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsENO1 protein, humanENO1 protein, ratPhosphopyruvate HydrataseTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32488097
PMCPMC7784979
OpenAlexW3030019706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.