Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488051›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Diagnosis of NTM active infection in lymphadenopathy patients with anti-interferon-gamma auto-antibody using inhibitory ELISA vs. indirect ELISA.

Arnone Nithichanon, Ploenchan Chetchotisakd, Takayuki Matsumura, Yoshimasa Takahashi, Manabu Ato, Takuro Sakagami, Ganjana Lertmemongkolchai

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Human autoantibodies underlying infectious diseases.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Minireview: Insights into anti-interferon-γ autoantibodies.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arnone NithichanonDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Ploenchan ChetchotisakdDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Takayuki MatsumuraDepartment of Immunology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Yoshimasa TakahashiDepartment of Immunology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Manabu AtoDepartment of Mycobacteriology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 189-0002, Japan.
Takuro SakagamiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kumamoto University Hospital, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Ganjana LertmemongkolchaiCellular and Molecular Immunology Unit, Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. ganja_le@kku.ac.th.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPKhon Kaen University · THKumamoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anti-interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) autoantibody is a known cause of opportunistic non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection in adults. Diagnosis of those patients is difficult due to the low sensitivity of bacterial culture, and because detection of the neutralizing autoantibody needs special laboratory devices. We conducted a retrospective review of indirect and inhibitory ELISA, both used for detection of anti-IFN-gamma auto-antibody in 102 patients with lymphadenopathies. We assessed hospital records of NTM isolation and/or diagnosis of NTM infection. The review revealed the compatible sensitivity and superior specificity and predictive values for inhibitory ELISA over against indirect ELISA-the latter achieving 100% specificity and positive predictive value for diagnosis of NTM infection in patients with lymphadenopathies. The results confirm functional assays that show plasma samples from NTM-infected patients with positive results by either indirect and/or inhibitory ELISA are IFN-gamma neutralizing autoantibodies. The inhibitory titer of anti-IFN-gamma auto-antibody can be used to distinguish patients with active from inactive NTM infection. Inhibitory ELISA is thus a practical, rapid, high performance tool for routine detection of anti-IFN-gamma autoantibody and NTM infection diagnosis before confirmation, enabling a timely therapeutic strategy for active infection treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAutoantibodiesBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaLymphadenopathyMaleMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousOpportunistic InfectionsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesBiomarkersInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID32488051
PMCPMC7265449
OpenAlexW3032634973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.