Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32488010›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Motor imagery training speeds up gait recovery and decreases the risk of falls in patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty.

Laura Zapparoli, Lucia Maria Sacheli, Silvia Seghezzi, Matteo Preti, Elena Stucovitz, Francesco Negrini, Catia Pelosi, Nicola Ursino, Giuseppe Banfi, Eraldo Paulesu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of Motor Imagery Training on Balance and Gait in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura ZapparoliPsychology Department and NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. laura.zapparoli@unimib.it.
Lucia Maria SacheliPsychology Department and NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Silvia SeghezziPsychology Department and NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Matteo PretiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Elena StucovitzIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Francesco NegriniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Catia PelosiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Nicola UrsinoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BanfiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Eraldo PaulesuPsychology Department and NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. eraldo.paulesu@unimib.it.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With Motor imagery (MI), movements are mentally rehearsed without overt actions; this procedure has been adopted in motor rehabilitation, primarily in brain-damaged patients. Here we rather tested the clinical potentials of MI in purely orthopaedic patients who, by definition, should maximally benefit of mental exercises because of their intact brain. To this end we studied the recovery of gait after total knee arthroplasty and evaluated whether MI combined with physiotherapy could speed up the recovery of gait and even limit the occurrence of future falls. We studied 48 patients at the beginning and by the end of the post-surgery residential rehabilitation program: half of them completed a specific MI training supported by computerized visual stimulation (experimental group); the other half performed a non-motoric cognitive training (control group). All patients also had standard physiotherapy. By the end of the rehabilitation, the experimental group showed a better recovery of gait and active knee flexion-extension movements, and less pain. The number of falls or near falls after surgery was significantly lower in the experimental group. These results show that MI can improve gait abilities and limit future falls in orthopaedic patients, without collateral risks and with limited costs.

Indexed as

GaitImagery, PsychotherapyMovementAccidental FallsAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationRecovery of FunctionRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32488010
PMCPMC7265300
OpenAlexW3030305615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.