Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487978›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Circulating miR-19a-3p and miR-483-5p as Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.

Jieyao Cheng, Aiming Yang, Shujun Cheng, Lin Feng, Xi Wu, Xinghua Lu, Ming Zu, Jianfang Cui, Hang Yu, Long Zou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum miR-19a-3p in patients with multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  11. Downregulation ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Role of miRNA-19a in Cancer Diagnosis and Poor Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jieyao ChengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Aiming YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Shujun ChengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China (mainland).
Lin FengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xi WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xinghua LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Ming ZuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jianfang CuiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Hang YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Long ZouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are attracting substantial interest as promising noninvasive biomarkers for gastric cancer (GC). Our study aimed to identify circulating miRNAs that are potential noninvasive markers for precancerous lesions and early gastric cancers (EGCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS Plasma specimens were obtained from 58 gastritis subjects, 54 patients with precancerous lesions, and 38 EGC patients for study. RESULTS Significant differences in the plasma expression levels of miR-19a-3p, miR-22-3p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-483-5p (all P<0.05) were observed between EGC patients and gastritis subjects. Multivariable analysis showed that age (OR, 1.054; 95% CI, 1.006-1.104), miR-19a-3p expression (OR, 3.676; 95% CI, 1.914-7.061), and miR-483-5p expression (OR, 1.589; 95% CI, 1.242-2.033) were independently associated with EGCs and precancerous lesions. A combined diagnostic model incorporating these 3 variables for the prediction of EGCs and precancerous lesions was derived. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the model was 0.84; the sensitivity was 87.7% and the specificity was 62.8% at the cutoff value of -0.08. CONCLUSIONS Plasma miR-19a-3p and miR-483-5p are promising and powerful noninvasive markers for the early detection of GC. Patients are more willing to undergo noninvasive diagnostic procedures than gastroscopy for cancer screening, economizing limited medical resources.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsMIRN19A microRNA, humanMIRN483 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID32487978
PMCPMC7297033
OpenAlexW3014891537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.