Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487754›Full record

ArticlemBio2020

Optimal Response to Quorum-Sensing Signals Varies in Different Host Environments with Different Pathogen Group Size.

Liqin Zhou, Leyla Slamti, Didier Lereclus, Ben Raymond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intraspecies heterogeneity in microbial interactions.Current opinion in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liqin ZhouSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.
Leyla SlamtiUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Didier LereclusUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Ben RaymondImperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom b.raymond@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-0985

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S002928/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of genetic variation in master regulators of gene expression, such as quorum-sensing systems, is hard to explain. Here, we investigated two alternative hypotheses for the prevalence of polymorphic quorum sensing in Gram-positive bacteria, i.e., the use of different signal/receptor pairs ('pherotypes') to regulate the same functions. First, social interactions between pherotypes or 'facultative cheating' may favor rare variants that exploit the signals of others. Second, different pherotypes may increase fitness in different environments. We evaluated these hypotheses in the invertebrate pathogen

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsQuorum SensingSignal TransductionAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacterial ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenotypeLarvaMothsBacterial ProteinscheatingcooperationPlcR/PapRpolymorphismsignalingvirulence regulation

Identifiers

PMID32487754
PMCPMC7267880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.