ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020
Predicting Stereopsis in Macular Degeneration.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cue combination for depth perception in macular degeneration: Motion parallax augments disparity.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The utility of peripheral stereopsis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Visual function and biofeedback training of patients with central vision loss: a review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Mapping residual stereopsis in macular degeneration.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The effect of spatial structure on binocular contrast perception.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022Review
- Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- Correlation between Central Visual Field Defects and Stereopsis in Patients with Early-to-Moderate Visual Field Loss.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Each of our eyes sees a slightly different view of the physical world. Disparity is the small difference in position of features in the retinal images; stereopsis is the percept of depth from disparity. A distance between corresponding features in the retinal images of the two eyes smaller than the "upper disparity limit" yields a percept of depth; distances greater than this limit cause the two unfused monocular features to appear flattened into the fixation plane. This behavioral disparity limit is consistent with neurophysiological estimates of the largest disparity scale in primate, allowing us to relate physiological limits on plausible binocular interactions to separation between retinal locations. Here we test the hypothesis that this upper disparity limit predicts the presence of coarse stereopsis in humans with macular degeneration (MD), which affects the central retina but typically spares the periphery. The pattern of vision loss can be highly asymmetric, such that an intact location in one eye has a corresponding point in the other eye that lies within affected retina. Nevertheless, some individuals with MD have coarse stereopsis that is useful for eye-hand coordination. Our results show that individuals with MD (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.