Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487269›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Using soil bacterial communities to predict physico-chemical variables and soil quality.

Syrie M Hermans, Hannah L Buckley, Bradley S Case, Fiona Curran-Cournane, Matthew Taylor, Gavin Lear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Pandan-vanilla rotation mitigatesFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unveiling the Hidden Responses: Metagenomic Insights into Dwarf Bamboo (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Enterobacteriaceae as a Key Indicator of Huanglongbing Infection inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Syrie M HermansSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Hannah L BuckleySchool of Science, Auckland University of Technology, 46 Wakefield St, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Bradley S CaseSchool of Science, Auckland University of Technology, 46 Wakefield St, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Fiona Curran-CournaneMinistry for the Environment - Manatū Mō Te Taiao, 45 Queen Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Matthew TaylorWaikato Regional Council, 401 Grey Street, Hamilton, 3216, New Zealand.
Gavin LearSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand. g.lear@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-5083-4773

Funding

New Zealand's Biological Heritage Project 1.3 of New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge (NSC) "A national framework for biological heritage assessment across natural and production landscapes"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoil ecosystems consist of complex interactions between biological communities and physico-chemical variables, all of which contribute to the overall quality of soils. Despite this, changes in bacterial communities are ignored by most soil monitoring programs, which are crucial to ensure the sustainability of land management practices. We applied 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine the bacterial community composition of over 3000 soil samples from 606 sites in New Zealand. Sites were classified as indigenous forests, exotic forest plantations, horticulture, or pastoral grasslands; soil physico-chemical variables related to soil quality were also collected. The composition of soil bacterial communities was then used to predict the land use and soil physico-chemical variables of each site.

resultsSoil bacterial community composition was strongly linked to land use, to the extent where it could correctly determine the type of land use with 85% accuracy. Despite the inherent variation introduced by sampling across ~ 1300 km distance gradient, the bacterial communities could also be used to differentiate sites grouped by key physico-chemical properties with up to 83% accuracy. Further, individual soil variables such as soil pH, nutrient concentrations and bulk density could be predicted; the correlations between predicted and true values ranged from weak (R

conclusionsThe inclusion of biological information when monitoring soil quality is crucial if we wish to gain a better, more accurate understanding of how land management impacts the soil ecosystem. We have shown that soil bacterial communities can provide biologically relevant insights on the impacts of land use on soil ecosystems. Furthermore, their ability to indicate changes in individual soil parameters shows that analysing bacterial DNA data can be used to screen soil quality. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

EcosystemSoilSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaNew ZealandRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilBacterial communitiesBacterial indicatorsBiomonitoringEnvironmental monitoringRandom forest analysisSoil healthSoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID32487269
PMCPMC7268603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.