ArticleMicrobiome2020
Using soil bacterial communities to predict physico-chemical variables and soil quality.
Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach to Ecologically Characterize Soil Carbon and Structure From Multi-Kingdom Microbiome, Texture and Climate.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Advances and future directions in identifying specific taxa from microbial meta-omics data: from pipeline to deep learning.mSystems · 2026Review
- Relationship between land use type and bacterial composition in adjacent streams and riparian zones.PloS one · 2026Article
- Metagenomic Tools as Predictive Approaches to Decipher Soil and Rhizosphere Microbial Communities and Their Functions for Sustainable Agriculture.International journal of genomics · 2026Review
- Soil Bacteriome Shifts along a Cultivation Gradient in Southwestern Spanish Wetlands.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Resource Management with Organic Fertilizer and Microbial Inoculants to Enhance Soil Quality, Microbial Diversity, and Crop Productivity in Newly Cultivated Land.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Temporal Beta Diversity of Bacteria in Streams: Network Position Matters But Differently for Bacterioplankton and Biofilm Communities.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of chemical fertilization on bacterial community in rhizosphere soil of sugarcane.PloS one · 2025Article
- Pandan-vanilla rotation mitigatesFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Endophytic Bacterial Community, Core Taxa, and Functional Variations Within the Fruiting Bodies ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Hidden Responses: Metagenomic Insights into Dwarf Bamboo (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Characteristics of Bacterial Community Structure and Function in Artificial Soil Prepared Using Red Mud and Phosphogypsum.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Exogenous selenium mitigates cadmium uptake and accumulation in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in cadmium-contaminated soil.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A smartphone-based approach for comprehensive soil microbiome profiling.Applied physics reviews · 2024Article
- Spatio-temporal changes of small protist and free-living bacterial communities in a temperate dimictic lake: insights from metabarcoding and machine learning.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Exploring freshwater stream bacterial communities as indicators of land use intensity.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Article
- Enterobacteriaceae as a Key Indicator of Huanglongbing Infection inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoil ecosystems consist of complex interactions between biological communities and physico-chemical variables, all of which contribute to the overall quality of soils. Despite this, changes in bacterial communities are ignored by most soil monitoring programs, which are crucial to ensure the sustainability of land management practices. We applied 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine the bacterial community composition of over 3000 soil samples from 606 sites in New Zealand. Sites were classified as indigenous forests, exotic forest plantations, horticulture, or pastoral grasslands; soil physico-chemical variables related to soil quality were also collected. The composition of soil bacterial communities was then used to predict the land use and soil physico-chemical variables of each site.
resultsSoil bacterial community composition was strongly linked to land use, to the extent where it could correctly determine the type of land use with 85% accuracy. Despite the inherent variation introduced by sampling across ~ 1300 km distance gradient, the bacterial communities could also be used to differentiate sites grouped by key physico-chemical properties with up to 83% accuracy. Further, individual soil variables such as soil pH, nutrient concentrations and bulk density could be predicted; the correlations between predicted and true values ranged from weak (R
conclusionsThe inclusion of biological information when monitoring soil quality is crucial if we wish to gain a better, more accurate understanding of how land management impacts the soil ecosystem. We have shown that soil bacterial communities can provide biologically relevant insights on the impacts of land use on soil ecosystems. Furthermore, their ability to indicate changes in individual soil parameters shows that analysing bacterial DNA data can be used to screen soil quality. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.