Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487213›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

The value of post-operative antibiotic therapy after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study (ABAP study).

C Sabbagh, N Siembida, H Dupont, M Diouf, J L Schmit, S Boddaert, J M Regimbeau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03688295 (The Value of Post-operative Antibiotic Therapy After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03688295 phase3recruitingnot on this map

The Value of Post-operative Antibiotic Therapy After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis (Other Than for Generalized Peritonitis): a Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensRan2019 to 2026Enrolled1,476ConditionsComplicated Acute AppendicitisArmsNo antibiotics, Antibiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aspiration versus peritoneal lavage in appendicitis: a meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C SabbaghDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens University Medical Center, Avenue Laennec, F-80054, Amiens cedex 01, France.
N SiembidaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens University Medical Center, Avenue Laennec, F-80054, Amiens cedex 01, France.
H DupontJules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
M DioufDepartment of Methodology, Biostatistics, Direction of Clinical Research, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
J L SchmitJules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
S BoddaertDepartment of Pharmacology, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
J M RegimbeauDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens University Medical Center, Avenue Laennec, F-80054, Amiens cedex 01, France. regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FR

Funding

PHRC national (French national ground) PI2017-843-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 30% of appendectomies are for complicated acute appendicitis (CAA). With laparoscopy, the main post-operative complication is deep abscesses (12% of cases of CAA, versus 4% for open surgery). A recent cohort study compared short and long courses of postoperative antibiotic therapy in patients with CAA. There was no significant intergroup difference in the post-operative complication rate (12% of organ/space surgical site infection (SSI)). Moreover, antibiotic therapy is increasingly less indicated for other situations (non-complicated appendicitis, post-operative course of cholecystitis, perianal abscess), calling into question whether post-operative antibiotic therapy is required after laparoscopic appendectomy for CAA. METHODS/

designThis study is a prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase III non-inferiority study with blind evaluation of the primary efficacy criterion. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of the absence of post-operative antibiotic therapy on the organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) rate in patients presenting with CAA (other than in cases of generalized peritonitis). Patients in the experimental group will receive at least one dose of preoperative and perioperative antibiotic therapy (2 g ceftriaxone by intravenous injection every 24 h up to the operation) and metronidazole (500 mg by intravenous injection every 8 h up to the operation) and, in the post-operative period, a placebo for ceftriaxone (2 g/24 h in one intravenous injection) and a placebo for metronidazole (1500 mg/24 h in three intravenous injections, for 3 days). In the control group, patients will receive at least one dose of preoperative and perioperative antibiotic therapy (2 g ceftriaxone by intravenous injection every 24 h up to the operation) and metronidazole (500 mg by intravenous injection every 8 h up to the operation) and, in the post-operative period, antibiotic therapy (ceftriaxone 2 g/24 h and metronidazole 1500 mg/24 h for 3 days). In the event of allergy to ceftriaxone, it will be replaced by levofloxacin (500 mg/24 h in one intravenous injection, for 3 days). The expected organ space SSI rate is 12% in the population of patients with CAA operated on by laparoscopy. With a non-inferiority margin of 5%, a two-sided alpha risk of 5%, a beta risk of 20%, and a loss-to-follow-up rate of 10%, the calculated sample size is 1476 included patients, i.e., 738 per group. Due to three interim analyses at 10%, 25%, and 50% of the planned sample size, the total sample size increases to 1494 patients (747 per arm).

trial registrationEthical authorization by the Comité de Protection des Personnes and the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament: ID-RCB 2017-00334-59. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03688295) on 28 September 2018.

Indexed as

Abdominal AbscessAdministration, IntravenousAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyAppendicitisClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic therapyComplicated appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID32487213
PMCPMC7268648
OpenAlexW3029647501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.